|
Post by 1dell on Mar 27, 2004 15:30:31 GMT -5
yOU ARE STARTING really scare me man. Yes Shyt is this: 1) to put, set a) (Qal) 1) to put, lay (hand upon) 2) to set, station, appoint, fix, set mind to 3) to constitute, make (one something), make like, perform 4) to take one's stand 5) to lay waste b) (Hophal) to be imposed, be set upon And your point is? The cat is flat out wrong, KHawah's son was named Set not Shit. Why did she name the child that name?: Gen 4:25 And Adam knew his wife again; and she bare a son, and called his name Seth: For God, [said she], hath appointed me another seed instead of Abel, whom Cain slew. Set means compensation. Because IHaWaH compensated her for the child she lost. Dayum keep the ish simple yall. Cuz I swear yall aint making no kinda sense. lol. God appointed (shyt) another seed instead of Abel whome Qayin slew....and his name was Set which was a compensation. so no bro, it may make you feel good to say I'm wrong but unfortunately I am far from wrong. Keep on keepin on. Take yo beaten like a RICHARD SIMMONS HOMIE! now come back here and bend down dammit! I aint thru!. Now Lets peep the word B'reshith. preposition BA [in] + noun RESHITH [beginning]. 1dell you wrong bros. The word he cited is SHYITH which means "to set" [appoint] and is spelt SCHIN , YOD, TAU. Not no SCHIN, TAU. You forgot one letter [yod] homie. And the reason "yi" are placed in there is because the "Yod" is represented at times in the english with the "y" or "i" letter. A'ight I am thru now. And you took yo beating like a skank dick simmons! LOL!!! Btw..., the scripture I gave you which used the word "man" in place of Adam. You still aint explaining why in hebrew it has ADM there since you wuz uptight and shizzle about the male [zekar] being found in other scripts. Youze forgot to make sure yo shizzle was covered cause man [adam] is also found in many scripts. You should have accepted my reasoning - hebraic words take on proper name and adjective forms at times, depending on the contxt. BALL IN YO COURT BUCKWHEAT! LOL!!!
|
|
|
Post by 1dell on Mar 27, 2004 15:35:34 GMT -5
Yeah I feel where you are going with that bro and thats an interesting concept, no doubt. Now we are making sense Genesis 4:25 Ben Qara Shem Sheth Elohim Shiyth Acher Zera Tachath Hebel Kiy Qayin HaraqWife of Adam (Hawwah) begat a Son called Seth, Elohim appointed him ‘Chief’ over the Tribe of Adamites, to replace Abel who Cain had murdered. Paraphrased by Derek HodgeWhat is important is to note that this scripture plays on the word Shiyth ‘to appoint, to set, to station’. Shiyth is the primitive root of the word SETH - ‘atone, compensate.’ When abridged with the word Bar-Shiyth, means Appointed Son, SETH. Whereas Adam and Hawwah had access to all the Elohiym in the garden. But having desecrated themselves, ‘Abel’ being murdered they offered up another son. Scripture tells us that Seth was after image and likeness of Adam, who is fashioned after the Elohiym. Seth than gave birth to Enosh – which is a 'mortal man'.
|
|
|
Post by kAHANyAH on Mar 27, 2004 15:43:07 GMT -5
1dell, sometimes (if not most of the times) when you get into a debate youre so fixed on your point of view you skew what others are saying. Here is a quote of what you said - "What makes it so dayum bad Kah is that "Seth" better spelled Set is Not even spelled Shiyth like derek is spelling it...". He never said Seth [set] is spelt - Shiyth. GO RE-READ HIS POST#169 and you will see he was showing the connection between the woman being appointed [SHIYTH] a son and the son's name [SETH]. POST#169, GO RE READ IT. And this time take yo time! . [this is strange, i find myself defending Knaxem! .... .... ] yOU ARE STARTING really scare me man. Yes Shyt is this: 1) to put, set a) (Qal) 1) to put, lay (hand upon) 2) to set, station, appoint, fix, set mind to 3) to constitute, make (one something), make like, perform 4) to take one's stand 5) to lay waste b) (Hophal) to be imposed, be set upon And your point is? The cat is flat out wrong, KHawah's son was named Set not Shit. Why did she name the child that name?: Gen 4:25 And Adam knew his wife again; and she bare a son, and called his name Seth: For God, [said she], hath appointed me another seed instead of Abel, whom Cain slew. Set means compensation. Because IHaWaH compensated her for the child she lost. Dayum keep the ish simple yall. Cuz I swear yall aint making no kinda sense. lol. God appointed (shyt) another seed instead of Abel whome Qayin slew....and his name was Set which was a compensation. so no bro, it may make you feel good to say I'm wrong but unfortunately I am far from wrong. Keep on keepin on.
|
|
|
Post by 1dell on Mar 27, 2004 15:58:14 GMT -5
I find it strange too that neither one of you are making cognitive points the points themselves of sofa king skewed thats why I said what I said and I am comforted knowing that I ain't the only one that notices this. another thing is you are so hell bent on trying to get along with every dayum body and see truth in what they are saying you start to follow them around like a lil puppy. The ish gotta make sense and follow logic, this bull jank doesn't 1dell, sometimes (if not most of the times) when you get into a debate youre so fixed on your point of view you skew what others are saying. Here is a quote of what you said - "What makes it so dayum bad Kah is that "Seth" better spelled Set is Not even spelled Shiyth like derek is spelling it...". He never said Seth [set] is spelt - Shiyth. GO RE-READ HIS POST#169 and you will see he was showing the connection between the woman being appointed [SHIYTH] a son and the son's name [SETH]. POST#169, GO RE READ IT. And this time take yo time! . [this is strange, i find myself defending Knaxem! .... .... ]
|
|
|
Post by 1dell on Mar 27, 2004 16:03:09 GMT -5
I am so fixed on my point of view mainly because most people I debate have no clue as to what they are doing and the basic fundamentals escape them. People too busy trynna sound deep and supposing they discovered some new doctrine or uncovered some nugget of truth then wanna come here and share or try to upstand somebody and their ish isn't thorough 1dell, sometimes (if not most of the times) when you get into a debate youre so fixed on your point of view you skew what others are saying. Here is a quote of what you said - "What makes it so dayum bad Kah is that "Seth" better spelled Set is Not even spelled Shiyth like derek is spelling it...". He never said Seth [set] is spelt - Shiyth. GO RE-READ HIS POST#169 and you will see he was showing the connection between the woman being appointed [SHIYTH] a son and the son's name [SETH]. POST#169, GO RE READ IT. And this time take yo time! . [this is strange, i find myself defending Knaxem! .... .... ]
|
|
|
Post by kAHANyAH on Mar 27, 2004 16:07:39 GMT -5
thats all fine and dandy but 1dell you made a FLAT OUT MISTAKE and you need to stand yoself corrected bros. Admit it! you were wrong when you said knaxem spelt Seth in the manner of shiyth. Admit it bros.! Lets see if you will admit fault I am so fixed on my point of view mainly because most people I debate have no clue as to what they are doing and the basic fundamentals escape them. People too busy trynna sound deep and supposing they discovered some new doctrine or uncovered some nugget of truth then wanna come here and share or try to upstand somebody and their ish isn't thorough
|
|
|
Post by kAHANyAH on Mar 27, 2004 16:13:55 GMT -5
and another thing! cause Im offended now! . what makes u sho shure you got it right and the rest got it wrong ? why is it you say the basic fundamentals, they got it all wrong , as if to say the creator of all things created ONE WAY to understand holy words ? I am so fixed on my point of view mainly because most people I debate have no clue as to what they are doing and the basic fundamentals escape them. People too busy trynna sound deep and supposing they discovered some new doctrine or uncovered some nugget of truth then wanna come here and share or try to upstand somebody and their ish isn't thorough
|
|
|
Post by 1dell on Mar 27, 2004 16:25:06 GMT -5
Yeah bro, I was wrong about that my bad. I read it while I am work answering phones and ducking supervisors trying not to let them see me on the internet. I work from 3-12 and that particular post, I remember specifically my supervisor coming over to me and I had to hide the screen before I got caught and then picked up in the another spot. Dayum coworker to my left talks my dayum ear off and it's hard to focus answering phones, listening to her ass and dodging supervisors. So yeah sorry about that derek, my bad dude. I over looked that. anyway can kiss and make up? , here is round 2: Gen 4:25 And Adam knew his wife again; and she bare a son, and called his name Seth: For God, [said she], hath appointed me another seed instead of Abel, whom Cain slew. Derek is saying that Eve appoint Set, here it clearly states that Eve is saying GOD APPOINTED her another seed. Another see for what? to be leaders of the Adamites? lol. That sounds like what yall 2 are agreeing on. You tell me bro both of yall niggas been wrong all day long when you gonna come forward with your confession? I am still scratching my head about what the hell was the point about Set in the first place. Adam had moor than one son Set anyway. The Qayinites had 130 year jump on the Setites and could have verywell destroyed Adam and his progeny. thats all fine and dandy but 1dell you made a FLAT OUT MISTAKE and you need to stand yoself corrected bros. Admit it! you were wrong when you said knaxem spelt Seth in the manner of shiyth. Admit it bros.! Lets see if you will admit fault
|
|
|
Post by 1dell on Mar 27, 2004 16:28:03 GMT -5
Nah bro, don't be hurt punk! You hurt me bad when you stole my Jimmy Snooka move! That one cut deep. But what I am saying bro, is people are taking the bible then add all this other garble de gook that aint got nothing to do with nothing. Thats like trying to combine the stories of Mars and Aries together to get one person when they are obviously 2 distinct people. Besides why are you offending? I wasn't talkin boutchu and another thing! cause Im offended now! . what makes u sho shure you got it right and the rest got it wrong ? why is it you say the basic fundamentals, they got it all wrong , as if to say the creator of all things created ONE WAY to understand holy words ?
|
|
|
Post by kAHANyAH on Mar 27, 2004 16:29:16 GMT -5
LOL!!!!!!!!!! now thats the 1dell i likes! wipes his face, and gets back up fo shome more can of whoop ass to take! Im comin for you in a few. Let me eat me some more cake then I will attend to the putting some biyotch back hand pimp pimp smack on yo ass! Yeah bro, I was wrong about that my bad. I read it while I am work answering phones and ducking supervisors trying not to let them see me on the internet. I work from 3-12 and that particular post, I remember specifically my supervisor coming over to me and I had to hide the screen before I got caught and then picked up in the another spot. Dayum coworker to my left talks my dayum ear off and it's hard to focus answering phones, listening to her ass and dodging supervisors. So yeah sorry about that derek, my bad dude. I over looked that. anyway can kiss and make up? , here is round 2: Gen 4:25 And Adam knew his wife again; and she bare a son, and called his name Seth: For God, [said she], hath appointed me another seed instead of Abel, whom Cain slew. Derek is saying that Eve appoint Set, here it clearly states that Eve is saying GOD APPOINTED her another seed. Another see for what? to be leaders of the Adamites? lol. That sounds like what yall 2 are agreeing on. You tell me bro both of yall niggas been wrong all day long when you gonna come forward with your confession? I am still scratching my head about what the hell was the point about Set in the first place. Adam had moor than one son Set anyway. The Qayinites had 130 year jump on the Setites and could have verywell destroyed Adam and his progeny.
|
|
|
Post by kAHANyAH on Mar 27, 2004 16:35:21 GMT -5
then fuggit! im offended for all the offended ones out there! LOL!! yo for real 1dell, know why Im defending knaxem (and i really dont like that nukka! specially how he comes to OUR HOUSE, all estranged talkin all that bulljangles!) , and Im'a charge his ass by the post too!, cause he has an alternative view. I use to be adamant one time in my life about my bible understanding. So ardent in my belief was I that I could not see the fact MAYBE I AM WRONG. I learned that lesson when I was a hebrew. I am now open to alternative views and if it has RHYME AND REASON to its madness, its definitely something to ponder on. You are too stuck in your old way of understanding scripture 1dell. Im tellin you this cause me and you go way back bruh., and what I see from you is the same breakdown you spewed back in the day. If im wrong, then brother I apologize. But if I am wrong then show me some new concept you discovered. Aight off my chest. PEACE! Nah bro, don't be hurt punk! You hurt me bad when you stole my Jimmy Snooka move! That one cut deep. But what I am saying bro, is people are taking the bible then add all this other garble de gook that aint got nothing to do with nothing. Thats like trying to combine the stories of Mars and Aries together to get one person when they are obviously 2 distinct people. Besides why are you offending? I wasn't talkin boutchu
|
|
|
Post by 1dell on Mar 27, 2004 16:57:10 GMT -5
I can respect that bro. I can respect what you been thru. But dude, the ONLY people I listen to are those who have studied this book THOROUGHLY!! Not some lukewarm nikka who got a problem with the book!! I want to listen to those who devoted their life to studying this book open mindedly. Hell I still have much to master regarding the writings of the hebrews fuck, the sumerians and egyptians. There is so much right here to learn. Not only that Kah really bro, who is telling the dayum truth? was you there during creation? was I? Hell no!!! none of us were so we are wasting time going back and forth over bullshit we can't prove beyond a dayum book. So what is the bible REALLY about?? it's about CONDUCT, it's about WORSHIP towards the God IHaWaH, it's about his SON and about Eternal life. So all this garbage we are going back and forth over don't even scratch the surface of what this book is about and it stretching it out of purpose. So nigga that got his foots in sumer, a toe in egypt and a pinky toe in the bible can't tell me shit! Sorry but thats how it is. Especially when all they do is mixing drinks and mingling seeds. All that ish does is breeds confusion. I can respect a man who has an alternative view, but this cat is flat out saying the bible is wrong and plagiarized and mistake laden. Thats just flat out incorrect and inaccurate. Side with who you must bro, as for me and Mine House, we shall serve IHaWaH then fuggit! im offended for all the offended ones out there! LOL!! yo for real 1dell, know why Im defending knaxem (and i really dont like that nukka! specially how he comes to OUR HOUSE, all estranged talkin all that bulljangles!) , and Im'a charge his ass by the post too!, cause he has an alternative view. I use to be adamant one time in my life about my bible understanding. So ardent in my belief was I that I could not see the fact MAYBE I AM WRONG. I learned that lesson when I was a hebrew. I am now open to alternative views and if it has RHYME AND REASON to its madness, its definitely something to ponder on. You are too stuck in your old way of understanding scripture 1dell. Im tellin you this cause me and you go way back bruh., and what I see from you is the same breakdown you spewed back in the day. If im wrong, then brother I apologize. But if I am wrong then show me some new concept you discovered. Aight off my chest. PEACE!
|
|
|
Post by kAHANyAH on Mar 27, 2004 17:01:14 GMT -5
A'ight you got yo devotion, its all good. Can't knock you for that. I dunno what to say at this point mang . CIGAR ANYONE ? I can respect that bro. I can respect what you been thru. But dude, the ONLY people I listen to are those who have studied this book THOROUGHLY!! Not some lukewarm nikka who got a problem with the book!! I want to listen to those who devoted their life to studying this book open mindedly. Hell I still have much to master regarding the writings of the hebrews fuck, the sumerians and egyptians. There is so much right here to learn. Not only that Kah really bro, who is telling the dayum truth? was you there during creation? was I? Hell no!!! none of us were so we are wasting time going back and forth over bullshit we can't prove beyond a dayum book. So what is the bible REALLY about?? it's about CONDUCT, it's about WORSHIP towards the God IHaWaH, it's about his SON and about Eternal life. So all this garbage we are going back and forth over don't even scratch the surface of what this book is about and it stretching it out of purpose. So nigga that got his foots in sumer, a toe in egypt and a pinky toe in the bible can't tell me shit! Sorry but thats how it is. Especially when all they do is mixing drinks and mingling seeds. All that ish does is breeds confusion. I can respect a man who has an alternative view, but this cat is flat out saying the bible is wrong and plagiarized and mistake laden. Thats just flat out incorrect and inaccurate. Side with who you must bro, as for me and Mine House, we shall serve IHaWaH
|
|
|
Post by KnaxemDead on Mar 27, 2004 17:06:15 GMT -5
The Actual Six Days of Creations are just a fraction of the Book of Genesis (Barashiyth). Thus OT writers did not want us to focus on the intricacies of creation, such as development of our solar systems to molecular cells. Rather the premise itself was to show how Patriarchs fashioned this family into a Nation. T'nakh is merely a Charter of Man's Mission in this world. It's a guide to their faith and pratice, with Sovereign Eloh as Elyown El. (Most High). It shows a link of authority of 'appointing' Adam then Seth onto Abraham the TENTH patriarch, whose ordination begin with 10 first utterances of Elohim. So it's an everlasting Covenant! Sanctified in this world and in the next.
|
|
|
Post by kAHANyAH on Mar 27, 2004 17:08:07 GMT -5
very well put! The Actual Six Days of Creations are just a fraction of the Book of Genesis (Barashiyth). Thus OT writers did not want us to focus on the intricacies of creation, such as development of our solar systems to molecular cells. Rather the premise itself was to show how Patriarchs fashioned this family into a Nation. T'nakh is merely a Charter of Man's Mission in this world. It's a guide to their faith and pratice, with Sovereign Eloh as Elyown El. (Most High). It shows a link of authority of 'appointing' Adam then Seth onto Abraham the TENTH patriarch, whose ordination begin with 10 first utterances of Elohim. So it's an everlasting Covenant! Sanctified in this world and in the next.
|
|