|
|
Post by kAHANyAH on Sept 8, 2004 18:32:48 GMT -5
Peace CoUrTnEy Call it what you will, if it comes from a guy it's ok, but God forbid i do the same thing, you can't handle it. Suddenly I am commiting some vile act of verbal abuse.. That's ok though, I know why you act in such a way. You go right ahead and say what you will, doesn't bother me one lil bit. Oh now you are inside my head and know what's opinion and what's just a diss.. I have better things to do than waste my time on the internet to diss.. I have nothing else to say to you - my conversation with you is over. |
|
|
|
Post by CoUrTnEy on Sept 9, 2004 9:40:16 GMT -5
I have thought about this and thought about this.. I prayed on it, and came across scripture Mathew 5:21-22. I was wrong for letting the conversation get the best of me.. I perhaps was wrong for calling your behavior pschizophrenic (I could have found a more diplomatic way to go about it).. It is not for me to call you a fool, but to point out the truth to you - either you will see the truth or you won't. I still believe that your response to what I said was unfair considering what our other male members have said to you before.. I still maintain that your view of this piece scripture is inaccurate as is my right to think and voice. I still maintain that Nuwaupoo is nonsense and I believe it has clouded your vision in relation to scripture.. So I appologize for the above mentioned wrongs on my part, but I again maintain my stance on the rest of it. |
|
|
|
Post by kAHANyAH on Sept 9, 2004 9:45:51 GMT -5
peace to you then CoUrTnEy. You still CoUrTnEy Luv  . Hey listen, we aint gone agree on all things and I dont expect you to accept what I say because I says so. I try to provide convincing compelling arguments of what I believe in. Don't mean everyone will catch on to what I know. As far as Nuwaupu clouding my judgment, Courtney I've been holding to the view of the sons of G-d as angels even before I checked out nuwaubu. The knowledge of sons of G-d as being a particular choir in the armies of heaven is an old hebrew mystiq theme. Aight peace. I have thought about this and thought about this.. I prayed on it, and came across scripture Mathew 5:21-22. I was wrong for letting the conversation get the best of me.. I perhaps was wrong for calling your behavior pschizophrenic (I could have found a more diplomatic way to go about it).. It is not for me to call you a fool, but to point out the truth to you - either you will see the truth or you won't. I still believe that your response to what I said was unfair considering what our other male members have said to you before.. I still maintain that your view of this piece scripture is inaccurate as is my right to think and voice. I still maintain that Nuwaupoo is nonsense and I believe it has clouded your vision in relation to scripture.. So I appologize for the above mentioned wrongs on my part, but I again maintain my stance on the rest of it. /me |
|
|
|
Post by gamaliel on Sept 9, 2004 19:46:00 GMT -5
peace to you then CoUrTnEy. You still CoUrTnEy Luv . Hey listen, we aint gone agree on all things and I dont expect you to accept what I say because I says so. I try to provide convincing compelling arguments of what I believe in. Don't mean everyone will catch on to what I know. As far as Nuwaupu clouding my judgment, Courtney I've been holding to the view of the sons of G-d as angels even before I checked out nuwaubu. The knowledge of sons of G-d as being a particular choir in the armies of heaven is an old hebrew mystiq theme. Aight peace. /me Hey U both cool it! We are all friends here. Now its my turn. OK I agree with Bel that these 'Sons of God' in this case are in fact Angels...but fallen Ones. The Book of Enoch goes into greater detail about this. The Ethiopian Orthodox Church even has this book in their canon of scripture. I also compared it to the original Hebrew context and it is what it is. Angels. Modern day Jewish commentaries (not all) even admit this but will say that Semitic mythology was the source for it.  The Good News Bible had gave this same interpretation. I was even taught this by my Grandfather who was a Pentecostal minister and the various churches I grew up in. So this has nuthin' to do with Nuwaupu. Thats my opinion. PEACE TO BOTH MY FRIENDS COURTNEY AND KAH  |
|
|
|
Post by CoUrTnEy on Sept 9, 2004 20:06:23 GMT -5
Well I am going to agree to disagree with you too big brother. I dont believe everything told to me in church - all too often people are quick to believe things in church without checking it out in the Bible themselves. Genesis 1 talks about everything procreating according to kind.. look at nature - you cannot cross a human and a horse and get a "hu-horse".. you cannot cross species barriers (that i know of).. this and the context that this passage has "sons of God" and other things, prove to me that we are talking about the Godly line of Seth marrying women of the ungodly line of Cain. I appreciate your input, but you know me - subborn as a mule. Hey U both cool it! We are all friends here. Now its my turn. OK I agree with Bel that these 'Sons of God' in this case are in fact Angels...but fallen Ones. The Book of Enoch goes into greater detail about this. The Ethiopian Orthodox Church even has this book in their canon of scripture. I also compared it to the original Hebrew context and it is what it is. Angels. Modern day Jewish commentaries (not all) even admit this but will say that Semitic mythology was the source for it. The Good News Bible had gave this same interpretation. I was even taught this by my Grandfather who was a Pentecostal minister and the various churches I grew up in. So this has nuthin' to do with Nuwaupu. Thats my opinion. PEACE TO BOTH MY FRIENDS COURTNEY AND KAH |
|
|
|
Post by gamaliel on Sept 9, 2004 20:20:16 GMT -5
Well I am going to agree to disagree with you too big brother. I dont believe everything told to me in church - all too often people are quick to believe things in church without checking it out in the Bible themselves. Genesis 1 talks about everything procreating according to kind.. look at nature - you cannot cross a human and a horse and get a "hu-horse".. you cannot cross species barriers (that i know of).. this and the context that this passage has "sons of God" and other things, prove to me that we are talking about the Godly line of Seth marrying women of the ungodly line of Cain. I appreciate your input, but you know me - subborn as a mule. hey its cool. I did my homework on it, read all kinds of books, been in all kinds of worship places, listened to different ministers. no one's salvation is based on wether we believe the'Sons of God' are Angels or not.  |
|
|
|
Post by CoUrTnEy on Sept 9, 2004 20:47:26 GMT -5
To that I whole heartedly agree Gamaliel. Sometimes in the heat of debate we lose sight of that fact (me included). no one's salvation is based on wether we believe the'Sons of God' are Angels or not. |
|
