|
|
Post by kAHANyAH on Sept 8, 2004 13:15:35 GMT -5
NUMBER ONE COURTNEY THIS IS DOCTRINAL DISCOURSE. IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WHAT A PERSON DOES IN REAL TIME. THERE IS NO SPOOKISM OR SKITZO THERE. I THINK YOURE TAKING A BIT OF A STRETCH PASSING A JUDGMENT CALL LIKE THAT ON A PERSON YOU DONT EVEN KNOW. THATS ONE. NUMBER TWO THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH NUWAUBU. LETS STICK TO THE FACTS AND MATTER AT HAND. DONT WANNA DIVERT OUR ATTN. NOW DO WE. NUMBER THREE, NEXT TIME COURTNEY IF YOU ARENT WILLING TO HEAR OTHER SIDES OF A STORY MAY I SUGGEST YOU MAKE A CLAIMER IN YOUR POST STATING YOU REALLY COULDNT CARE LESS TO HEAR ANYTHING THAT IS DIFFERENT FROM YOUR POINT OF VIEW. BELIEVE YOU ME IT WOULD SAVE WASTED TIME ON THE EFFORTS OF THOSE WHO ARE WILLING TO GIVE YOU ANOTHER PERSPECTIVE TO THINGS. AIGHT PEACE.  That's a bit of a stretch i think.. Be different if we were reading the account in real time.. but we aren't .. it was written years later.. sorry that just doesn't work for me.. im not being mean spirited, I am telling the truth. You been "out there" for a while now Kah, I think that nuwaubian nonsense has seeped into your brain and clouded your thinking. I am not the only one to say so. Oh and as far as that seargant thing goes.. if we are telling the story about what he did years prior, we might call him "former sargeant".. your reasoning is too much of a stretch for me. |
|
|
|
Post by kAHANyAH on Sept 8, 2004 13:18:39 GMT -5
This is what you said ... "There are spookists (and I know Kah will chime in on this), that say the scripture is implying that angels had sex with daughters of men." That my dear is an open invitation for comment and rebut. Oh and one last thing, i didnt post this to start an arguement or expecting a rebuttle, I did it to empart knowlege. |
|
|
|
Post by CoUrTnEy on Sept 8, 2004 13:21:59 GMT -5
I didnt pass judgement.. i described behavior and what it reminded me of.. I listened to what you had to say and pointed out errors (just as you have done in other arenas) - since when does that mean i refuse to listen.. what i have refused to do (as is my right) is to believe some nonsense that is obviously wrong. You are just mad that you can't convince me of that trash. Nuwaupoo has everything to do with it, it clouds people's hearts and minds to the truth.
|
|
|
|
Post by CoUrTnEy on Sept 8, 2004 13:27:00 GMT -5
Ok i misspoke on that one.. i shouldve said my ultimate goal was not a rebuttle, but knowing you over the last few months and seeing some of your over the top posts, I knew at least you would respond. My ultimate goal was to share knowlege. Not argue with you all day. This is what you said ... "There are spookists (and I know Kah will chime in on this), that say the scripture is implying that angels had sex with daughters of men." That my dear is an open invitation for comment and rebut. |
|
|
|
Post by kAHANyAH on Sept 8, 2004 13:31:46 GMT -5
Now courtney I would not dare call what you believe in TRASH. Is it possible to reciprocate that courtesy ? NEVER MIND that. I dont wish to do nothing to you but share what I know and if you want it fine, if not so be it. Its not so much you refuse to listen, its this NEGATIVE RESPONSE without respect that is troublesome. If you didnt want to hear trash, next time make a claimer telling people you will resort to name calling and passing judgment if what you "hear" is perceived by you to be trash or whatever other labels you want to name it. Atleast I will be on alert and more apprehensive about posting replies to you. I gots luv for ya sis but you need to go re-read the entire thread and see the change in your tone and how very demeaning you were towards me. I came into this thread with nothin but respect and luv. What you tossed back at me... ish like that I expect from Nuwaubian_htp, Greg [Ak2] and the likes. But not you. I didnt pass judgement.. i described behavior and what it reminded me of.. I listened to what you had to say and pointed out errors (just as you have done in other arenas) - since when does that mean i refuse to listen.. what i have refused to do (as is my right) is to believe some nonsense that is obviously wrong. You are just mad that you can't convince me of that trash. Nuwaupoo has everything to do with it, it clouds people's hearts and minds to the truth. |
|
|
|
Post by kAHANyAH on Sept 8, 2004 13:33:16 GMT -5
You misspoke on that alright and that was the first post and it spawned all this ish. This is a board for all kinds of thoughts. Including what you think is OVER THE TOP. If you cannot handle what you interpret OVER THE TOP, say the magic words sis and i wont break bread with you. Its your call CoUrTnEy. Ok i misspoke on that one.. i shouldve said my ultimate goal was not a rebuttle, but knowing you over the last few months and seeing some of your over the top posts, I knew at least you would respond. My ultimate goal was to share knowlege. Not argue with you all day. |
|
|
|
Post by nuwaubianhotep on Sept 8, 2004 13:51:10 GMT -5
Nuwaupoo has everything to do with it, it clouds people's hearts and minds to the truth. . It appears to me Courtney that you are attemping to use the sacred science of Nuwaupu to win a debate by associating it with Dario who breaks bread with Nuwaubians but has stated that he is not a Nuwaubian, thereby competely invalidating your entire argument. Courtney if you wish to be perceived as engaging intelligently in this debate, I suggest you stick to the subject at hand as Dario mentioned. Kinda reminds me of the paganistic, ritual Catholic days of Virginia where they burnt the Wicca Women at the stake for their practice of Voodun. I will not attempt to address the subject matter at hand, I just wanted to interject with my above mentioned statement. As you were....... |
|
|
|
Post by CoUrTnEy on Sept 8, 2004 13:53:05 GMT -5
Never said I couldnt handle it, and trust that I can. You are just mad because I'm not going along with what you believe.. I think the idea of this passage referring to angels is trash, take it personal if you want to. What I have said is no where near what hoetep has done and said. I am expressing my opinion.. just like you have told others, when you post you are up for scrutiny.. I have listened and listened and now it is my turn to give my opinion.. I'm sorry if you dont like my opinion, but it's just that, MY OPINION. This is an open forum, discourse is welcomed.. but we aren't all going to agree all the time.. you were allowed, just as I was, to voice those opinions.. so give me a break about this disclaimer crap.. You misspoke on that alright and that was the first post and it spawned all this ish. This is a board for all kinds of thoughts. Including what you think is OVER THE TOP. If you cannot handle what you interpret OVER THE TOP, say the magic words sis and i wont break bread with you. Its your call CoUrTnEy. |
|
|
|
Post by CoUrTnEy on Sept 8, 2004 13:58:33 GMT -5
There is nothing sacred about nuwaupoo ... a cult lead by an admitted child molester.. a leader that copies his stuff off others and passes it as his own.. using and abusing women.. I didnt call him nuwaubian, but obviously his exposure to it has changed him, I have seen that over time.. changed him and clouded his vision.. but like i said, what i have expressed is my opinion and I have the right to express as everyone else, disagreeing with Kah does not imply i refuse to hear others opinions, but it is my response to it. He has the right to disagree with me, so be it. It appears to me Courtney that you are attemping to use the sacred science of Nuwaupu to win a debate by associating it with Dario who breaks bread with Nuwaubians but has stated that he is not a Nuwaubian, thereby competely invalidating your entire argument. Courtney if you wish to be perceived as engaging intelligently in this debate, I suggest you stick to the subject at hand as Dario mentioned. Kinda reminds me of the paganistic ritualic catholic days of Virginia where they burnt the Wicca Women at the stake for their practice of Voodun. I will not attempt to address the subject matter at hand, I just wanted to interject with my above mentioned statement. As you were....... |
|
|
|
Post by nuwaubianhotep on Sept 8, 2004 14:06:33 GMT -5
There is nothing sacred about nuwaupoo ... And yet, you refer to it in every other sentence? What an oxymoron this presents. |
|
|
|
Post by CoUrTnEy on Sept 8, 2004 14:13:40 GMT -5
Actually you are exaggerating. It is not in every other sentence... the mention of something does not declare it sacred... the is mention of all sorts of things during the day - doesnt make each and every thing holy.. And yet, you refer to it in every other sentence? What an oxymoron this presents. |
|
|
|
Post by CoUrTnEy on Sept 8, 2004 14:18:33 GMT -5
I was just thinking, it's funny that when ever someone else (male) calls an idea of yours "bulljank" you dont take offense, but suddenly my opinion of your explanation of this passage as trash is offensive. Take that sexist stuff elsewhere. If you can't take the heat dont stay in the kitchen. Nuff said.
|
|
|
|
Post by kAHANyAH on Sept 8, 2004 16:28:08 GMT -5
What I do wit nuwaubian_htp or Greg or even 1dell at that its PRANKTER. However what you did is not just an opinion [which btw i can hanlde], Its skrate up bulljank diss. DISSING AINT SCRUTINY. DISSIN IS DRAMA. Now if that is how you interact then I place you in the same basket I do others I prank wit and i'll resort to name calling and dissing, yadayadayada. I aint know thats how you deal. Which is kewl. I aint got a problem with pranksters (im one myself). So peace on it. From now forth when I dont agree wit your BULLJANK reasoning skills and weak assp scripture comprehension and lack of knowledge pertaining to holy writs, I WILL LET YOU KNOW.  I was just thinking, it's funny that when ever someone else (male) calls an idea of yours "bulljank" you dont take offense, but suddenly my opinion of your explanation of this passage as trash is offensive. Take that sexist stuff elsewhere. If you can't take the heat dont stay in the kitchen. Nuff said. |
|
|
|
Post by kAHANyAH on Sept 8, 2004 16:31:33 GMT -5
You have keen sense of inner-standing broham Barry. I notice that ish tactic also on CoUrTnEY's part. It appears to me Courtney that you are attemping to use the sacred science of Nuwaupu to win a debate by associating it with Dario who breaks bread with Nuwaubians but has stated that he is not a Nuwaubian, thereby competely invalidating your entire argument. Courtney if you wish to be perceived as engaging intelligently in this debate, I suggest you stick to the subject at hand as Dario mentioned. Kinda reminds me of the paganistic, ritual Catholic days of Virginia where they burnt the Wicca Women at the stake for their practice of Voodun. I will not attempt to address the subject matter at hand, I just wanted to interject with my above mentioned statement. As you were....... |
|
|
|
Post by CoUrTnEy on Sept 8, 2004 16:57:55 GMT -5
Call it what you will, if it comes from a guy it's ok, but God forbid i do the same thing, you can't handle it. Suddenly I am commiting some vile act of verbal abuse.. That's ok though, I know why you act in such a way. You go right ahead and say what you will, doesn't bother me one lil bit. Oh now you are inside my head and know what's opinion and what's just a diss.. I have better things to do than waste my time on the internet to diss.. I have nothing else to say to you - my conversation with you is over. What I do wit nuwaubian_htp or Greg or even 1dell at that its PRANKTER. However what you did is not just an opinion [which btw i can hanlde], Its skrate up bulljank diss. DISSING AINT SCRUTINY. DISSIN IS DRAMA. Now if that is how you interact then I place you in the same basket I do others I prank wit and i'll resort to name calling and dissing, yadayadayada. I aint know thats how you deal. Which is kewl. I aint got a problem with pranksters (im one myself). So peace on it. From now forth when I dont agree wit your BULLJANK reasoning skills and weak assp scripture comprehension and lack of knowledge pertaining to holy writs, I WILL LET YOU KNOW. |
|
