Post by Master-9 on Jun 15, 2004 21:32:38 GMT -5
Tribal News: Was Malachi York Found Guilty Beyond Reasonable Doubt?
Ask the system, with all of the letters, phones calls, emails, new evidence, no DNA evidence, no physical evidence, no videos, no audios, no medical evidence, no physical witnesses, and with recantment after recantment after recantment, is Dr. Malachi Z. York still in jail? According to the Black Law’s Dictionary, Seventh Edition by Bryan A. Garner, Editor in Chief on page 1,272 Reasonable Doubt is defined as...
“The doubt that prevents one from being firmly convinced of a defendant’s guilt, or the belief that there is a real possibility that a defendant is not guilty. “Beyond a reasonable doubt” is the standard used by a jury to determine whether a criminal defendant is guilty. In deciding whether guilt had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, the jury must begin with the presumption that the defendant in innocent.”<br>
Now with this in mind ask yourself these questions:
Q: When The FBI Reports did not match up to Amala “Amanda” Noel’s statement that she made under oath and when asked, “So if the officers recall you stating that it occurred in a place that you are denying in their report, they would be lying, right?” And Amala “Amanda” Noel said, “Yes, I guess they made a mistake.” A mistake is perjury on the stand and a lie is perjury on the stand there is no difference, and both are subject to Reasonable Doubt and Impeachment. So does this mean, Reasonable Doubt?
A: Yes
Q: Additionally, when Amala “Amanda” Noel’s statements that she made on the stand during the trial of Malachi York contradicted statements she made to the grand jury, she said, “I didn’t lie intentionally, I must’ve been mistaken.” Does all these mistakes made by both the FBI and Amala “Amanda” Noel, constitute Reasonable Doubt?
A:Yes
Q: When Federal Agent Jalaine Ward got on the stand a second time and was asked, “Isn’t it true that on May 9, 2002 and May 13, 2002, you said that you had No Witnesses that state that the intent of the travel was for the purpose of having sex with minors?” Federal Agent Jalaine Ward clearly stated that she had no written statements that Mr. York transported minors across the state lines for indecent purposes under oath and stated that she had NO WITNESSES to even bring about an Indictment, does that mean that there was Reasonable Doubt?
A: Yes
Q: When Ginger Chang got on the stand and was asked, “Did the Government Promise to drop your charges if you testified against Mr. York?” And Ginger Chang said “Yes.” And fatherly admitted that Mr. York had never done anything to her or her children, that she was confused and didn’t know if she was dreaming for being there. In other words what am I doing here, does that mean Reasonable Doubt?
A: Yes
Q: When Medical Expert Kristie Postorino employed at the Children’s National Medical Center, Child and Adolescent Protection Department in Washington, D.C. stated that, “Krystal Harden sounded rehearsed, meaning that she was making her statement using a monotone voice rather than showing expression when you talk meaning that you actually went through something…” When also asked, “So, are you stating that Krystal Harden sounded like she was making false allegations?”, she stated, “I can’t give my opinion weather the statements were false, she just sounded rehearsed.” So does that mean that there was Reasonable Doubt?
A: Yes
Q: When the Medical Results came back from Terese Degrandi of the Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta in Atlanta, GA that were no previous scars of healing or damage and that she could not indicate that any sexual abuse occurred and that her findings were inclusive, and did not prove that molestation occurred, does that mean that there was Reasonable Doubt?
A: Yes
Q: When Khalid “Eddie” Eddington’s testimony had to be impeached because statements he made on government documents contradicted information he gave to the Government on the stand, does that mean that there was Reasonable Doubt?
A: Yes
Q: When Habiba “Abigail” Washington, the Government’s key witness got on the stand and was asked by the Government, “Did Mr. York give you any instructions on how to deposit large amounts of money?” Her immediate response was, “No, Never.” Thus, Habiba “Abigail” Washington stated that Mr. York NEVER told her to structure money, which was the whole basis of Mr. York’s case; does that mean that there was Reasonable Doubt?
A: Yes
Q: Can a Man between the age of 50 and 60 years old have sexual intercourse to the extent that the Prosecution is alleging 11 times per day everyday for 15 years, when Medical research proves that after a man turns 35 that his testosterone level drops every year, and Mr. York suffers a life-threatening disease called Hereditary Angoiedema diagnosed by Dr. Thompson and a Prison Physician at USP Atlanta Federal Penitentiary, that fatherly decreases his testosterone? No, this is IMPOSSIBLE. So again, does that mean that there was Reasonable Doubt?
A: Yes
Q: When Juror #62, the only black juror, provided a handwritten note to Judge C. Ashley Royal, expressing her concerns that she felt that Malachi York was set up and that an INNOCENT man should not be sent to prison, and Judge C. Ashley Royal threatened to have her removed from the jury box, does that mean that there was Reasonable Doubt?
A: Yes
So, was Dr. Malachi Z. York, found guilty beyond a Reasonable Doubt? The answer is NO. NO. NO. This whole case was Reasonable Doubt. It doesn’t stop there. The Lead Investigating Federal Agent Jalaine Ward through a series of questions, was asked, Did you find any pictures of the defendant with any of the alleged victims nude? Jalaine Ward said NO. Did you find any videotapes of the defendant with any of the alleged victims? Jalaine Ward said No. Did you have any evidence that Mr. York transported kids across the state lines for indecent purposes? Jalaine Ward said, “I didn’t have any, you know evidence or any specifics that evidence was there.” Did you have any witnesses to these alleged victims being transported? Jalaine Ward said, NO I Had NO WITNESSES! So now you have the Lead Federal Agent for the Malachi York cases admitting that she had no evidence and no witnesses and the Government’s key witness Habiba “Abigail” Washington stating that this whole case was a conspiracy and based on lies. Not to mention that Habiba “Abigail” Washington admitted on the stand to the Government that Mr. York never told her to structure money. So here you have the only two reasons for this case Transportation and Money Structuring and both the Lead Federal Agent Jalaine Ward said she didn’t have any evidence and the Government’s key witness Habiba “Abigail” Washington admitting that Mr. York never had anything to do with the money. So I ask, How INNOCENT does a Man have to be, before you SET HIM FREE!!!!
THIS IS A PUBLIC OUT CRY FREE KATHY AND MALCHI!
Ask the system, with all of the letters, phones calls, emails, new evidence, no DNA evidence, no physical evidence, no videos, no audios, no medical evidence, no physical witnesses, and with recantment after recantment after recantment, is Dr. Malachi Z. York still in jail? According to the Black Law’s Dictionary, Seventh Edition by Bryan A. Garner, Editor in Chief on page 1,272 Reasonable Doubt is defined as...
“The doubt that prevents one from being firmly convinced of a defendant’s guilt, or the belief that there is a real possibility that a defendant is not guilty. “Beyond a reasonable doubt” is the standard used by a jury to determine whether a criminal defendant is guilty. In deciding whether guilt had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, the jury must begin with the presumption that the defendant in innocent.”<br>
Now with this in mind ask yourself these questions:
Q: When The FBI Reports did not match up to Amala “Amanda” Noel’s statement that she made under oath and when asked, “So if the officers recall you stating that it occurred in a place that you are denying in their report, they would be lying, right?” And Amala “Amanda” Noel said, “Yes, I guess they made a mistake.” A mistake is perjury on the stand and a lie is perjury on the stand there is no difference, and both are subject to Reasonable Doubt and Impeachment. So does this mean, Reasonable Doubt?
A: Yes
Q: Additionally, when Amala “Amanda” Noel’s statements that she made on the stand during the trial of Malachi York contradicted statements she made to the grand jury, she said, “I didn’t lie intentionally, I must’ve been mistaken.” Does all these mistakes made by both the FBI and Amala “Amanda” Noel, constitute Reasonable Doubt?
A:Yes
Q: When Federal Agent Jalaine Ward got on the stand a second time and was asked, “Isn’t it true that on May 9, 2002 and May 13, 2002, you said that you had No Witnesses that state that the intent of the travel was for the purpose of having sex with minors?” Federal Agent Jalaine Ward clearly stated that she had no written statements that Mr. York transported minors across the state lines for indecent purposes under oath and stated that she had NO WITNESSES to even bring about an Indictment, does that mean that there was Reasonable Doubt?
A: Yes
Q: When Ginger Chang got on the stand and was asked, “Did the Government Promise to drop your charges if you testified against Mr. York?” And Ginger Chang said “Yes.” And fatherly admitted that Mr. York had never done anything to her or her children, that she was confused and didn’t know if she was dreaming for being there. In other words what am I doing here, does that mean Reasonable Doubt?
A: Yes
Q: When Medical Expert Kristie Postorino employed at the Children’s National Medical Center, Child and Adolescent Protection Department in Washington, D.C. stated that, “Krystal Harden sounded rehearsed, meaning that she was making her statement using a monotone voice rather than showing expression when you talk meaning that you actually went through something…” When also asked, “So, are you stating that Krystal Harden sounded like she was making false allegations?”, she stated, “I can’t give my opinion weather the statements were false, she just sounded rehearsed.” So does that mean that there was Reasonable Doubt?
A: Yes
Q: When the Medical Results came back from Terese Degrandi of the Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta in Atlanta, GA that were no previous scars of healing or damage and that she could not indicate that any sexual abuse occurred and that her findings were inclusive, and did not prove that molestation occurred, does that mean that there was Reasonable Doubt?
A: Yes
Q: When Khalid “Eddie” Eddington’s testimony had to be impeached because statements he made on government documents contradicted information he gave to the Government on the stand, does that mean that there was Reasonable Doubt?
A: Yes
Q: When Habiba “Abigail” Washington, the Government’s key witness got on the stand and was asked by the Government, “Did Mr. York give you any instructions on how to deposit large amounts of money?” Her immediate response was, “No, Never.” Thus, Habiba “Abigail” Washington stated that Mr. York NEVER told her to structure money, which was the whole basis of Mr. York’s case; does that mean that there was Reasonable Doubt?
A: Yes
Q: Can a Man between the age of 50 and 60 years old have sexual intercourse to the extent that the Prosecution is alleging 11 times per day everyday for 15 years, when Medical research proves that after a man turns 35 that his testosterone level drops every year, and Mr. York suffers a life-threatening disease called Hereditary Angoiedema diagnosed by Dr. Thompson and a Prison Physician at USP Atlanta Federal Penitentiary, that fatherly decreases his testosterone? No, this is IMPOSSIBLE. So again, does that mean that there was Reasonable Doubt?
A: Yes
Q: When Juror #62, the only black juror, provided a handwritten note to Judge C. Ashley Royal, expressing her concerns that she felt that Malachi York was set up and that an INNOCENT man should not be sent to prison, and Judge C. Ashley Royal threatened to have her removed from the jury box, does that mean that there was Reasonable Doubt?
A: Yes
So, was Dr. Malachi Z. York, found guilty beyond a Reasonable Doubt? The answer is NO. NO. NO. This whole case was Reasonable Doubt. It doesn’t stop there. The Lead Investigating Federal Agent Jalaine Ward through a series of questions, was asked, Did you find any pictures of the defendant with any of the alleged victims nude? Jalaine Ward said NO. Did you find any videotapes of the defendant with any of the alleged victims? Jalaine Ward said No. Did you have any evidence that Mr. York transported kids across the state lines for indecent purposes? Jalaine Ward said, “I didn’t have any, you know evidence or any specifics that evidence was there.” Did you have any witnesses to these alleged victims being transported? Jalaine Ward said, NO I Had NO WITNESSES! So now you have the Lead Federal Agent for the Malachi York cases admitting that she had no evidence and no witnesses and the Government’s key witness Habiba “Abigail” Washington stating that this whole case was a conspiracy and based on lies. Not to mention that Habiba “Abigail” Washington admitted on the stand to the Government that Mr. York never told her to structure money. So here you have the only two reasons for this case Transportation and Money Structuring and both the Lead Federal Agent Jalaine Ward said she didn’t have any evidence and the Government’s key witness Habiba “Abigail” Washington admitting that Mr. York never had anything to do with the money. So I ask, How INNOCENT does a Man have to be, before you SET HIM FREE!!!!
THIS IS A PUBLIC OUT CRY FREE KATHY AND MALCHI!