|
|
Post by 1dell on Jun 11, 2004 11:47:16 GMT -5
DAYUM!! nah hold up bru. Icons ain't all fixed. That icon still aint crying like it's supposed to dayum!! |
|
|
|
Post by kAHANyAH on Jun 11, 2004 11:58:20 GMT -5
Damm! I aint realized that. That one slipped by me! A'ight gotta be an indian giver and take back my kudos! sorry.  DAYUM!! nah hold up bru. Icons ain't all fixed. That icon still aint crying like it's supposed to dayum!! |
|
|
|
Post by kAHANyAH on Jun 11, 2004 12:02:04 GMT -5
Peep this 1dell. We gone lay down some ground rules for Kat Lady so she can know how this debate will proceed. We'll start a new thread on said topic [144k were not defiled with women]. One posts, the other rebutts. Then kat lady comes in and makes the judgment call. We continue, post - rebutt. Kat Lady comes in makes judgment call. etc... This will go on until kat lady gets the sense for where each of us wanna go with our arguments, she then concludes the debate and makes an over-all analysis and decision.
You agree 1dell ?
|
|
|
|
Post by 1dell on Jun 11, 2004 13:57:30 GMT -5
we need better rules. And I think we should have multiple judges. I like my other idea better. And 144 were not defiled with women. Aint the thought behind my post so thats no good. I brought this post up for an entirely different reason and to turn it into Debate Fodder demeans the heart of the topic. Use something else for the debate coloseum. This subject was posted that great minds could converge on the subject and bring pieces of puzzles together. Not try to force some illogical argument down my throat. Peep this 1dell. We gone lay down some ground rules for Kat Lady so she can know how this debate will proceed. We'll start a new thread on said topic [144k were not defiled with women]. One posts, the other rebutts. Then kat lady comes in and makes the judgment call. We continue, post - rebutt. Kat Lady comes in makes judgment call. etc... This will go on until kat lady gets the sense for where each of us wanna go with our arguments, she then concludes the debate and makes an over-all analysis and decision. You agree 1dell ? |
|
|
|
Post by kAHANyAH on Jun 11, 2004 16:00:07 GMT -5
LOL!! youse a trip!. Listen mang, of all illumonopolites, kat lady has demonstrated she bows to truth no matter which way it goes. She is the most impartial person on the board. Plus she has the intellegence to discern illogical shiznics (that u be droppin LOL!) from real sensible reasoning out there. I say we need ONE JUDGE ONLY. Thats it! Know what! just thought of another person who'd make a hell of a judge - ESHU THE CLOWN!. A wise brother and one that knows how to call heads or tail of things. we need better rules. And I think we should have multiple judges. I like my other idea better. And 144 were not defiled with women. Aint the thought behind my post so thats no good. I brought this post up for an entirely different reason and to turn it into Debate Fodder demeans the heart of the topic. Use something else for the debate coloseum. This subject was posted that great minds could converge on the subject and bring pieces of puzzles together. Not try to force some illogical argument down my throat. |
|
;D 
