|
|
Post by BalkisII on Apr 29, 2004 8:40:43 GMT -5
the funny thing is they show the letter SENT there, but only the envelope of the so called returned letter. that shows how stupid they KNOW their congragation is. becasue they are using the 2 to say - 'see they responded' but not show the response! lol Exactly, but I bet we wont see nor hear about that! |
|
|
|
Post by ELTRUTH on Apr 29, 2004 9:28:24 GMT -5
Exactly, but I bet we wont see nor hear about that! yes we will -2 month after his SECOND sentence - and his computer departments get to doctor it up- with his approval - it will- be posted!  |
|
|
|
Post by Nubian Ninjah on Apr 29, 2004 9:40:40 GMT -5
damn u fine Sistah  (balkis) |
|
|
|
Post by TumRe on Apr 29, 2004 9:52:42 GMT -5
Hotep,
Instead of making assumptions as to the authenticity of the letter from the international courts, why do not you all call the land and ask? Facts, remember. On the official site it says March, 23, 2004. It is the end of April now.
Maku only signed/plead to anything stating he did these alleged crimes because he was told that kathy was experiencing the same things he was experiencing while incarcerated.
The world is aware of what is going on. There are foreign news outlets that are doing reports on the Maku.
Hotep, thefolks,
to say that a man is guilty becuase of confession is to say that man is not guilty because of re-confession. Not only from his own mouth but from "victims" as well.
peace
|
|
|
|
Post by BalkisII on Apr 29, 2004 13:18:29 GMT -5
Typical nuwaubian double edge talk! Hotep, Hotep, thefolks, to say that a man is guilty becuase of confession is to say that man is not guilty because of re-confession. Not only from his own mouth but from "victims" as well. peace |
|
|
|
Post by TumRe on Apr 29, 2004 13:27:24 GMT -5
Hotep,
typical un-nuwuabian talk.
peace
|
|
|
|
Post by CoUrTnEy on Apr 29, 2004 13:31:21 GMT -5
actually it would make him a liar.. just like that habiba person.. once you discover a person is a liar how can you trust ANYTHING a person says.. they have revealed that they can lie and could be lying now as well.. all the flip flop does is discredit the liar. Hotep, Instead of making assumptions as to the authenticity of the letter from the international courts, why do not you all call the land and ask? Facts, remember. On the official site it says March, 23, 2004. It is the end of April now. Maku only signed/plead to anything stating he did these alleged crimes because he was told that kathy was experiencing the same things he was experiencing while incarcerated. The world is aware of what is going on. There are foreign news outlets that are doing reports on the Maku. Hotep, thefolks, to say that a man is guilty becuase of confession is to say that man is not guilty because of re-confession. Not only from his own mouth but from "victims" as well. peace |
|
|
|
Post by BalkisII on Apr 29, 2004 13:42:07 GMT -5
Yes, I agree with you Courtney. All this flip flop is DEFINATELY showing that they BOTH ARE LYING somewhere along the lines.  |
|
|
|
Post by TumRe on Apr 29, 2004 13:54:32 GMT -5
Hotep,
As previously mentioned, he only consented to anything because he thought it would protect kathy.
|
|
|
|
Post by TumRe on Apr 29, 2004 13:55:44 GMT -5
On the otherside of can lie, is can be telling the truth now.
|
|
|
|
Post by BalkisII on Apr 29, 2004 14:25:27 GMT -5
And Kathy SAID HE DID IT BECAUSE...  Hotep, As previously mentioned, he only consented to anything because he thought it would protect kathy. |
|
|
|
Post by CoUrTnEy on Apr 29, 2004 14:27:36 GMT -5
but you can never be certain because they have admitted to being a liar- hence their credibility is null. On the otherside of can lie, is can be telling the truth now. |
|
|
|
Post by BalkisII on Apr 29, 2004 14:30:09 GMT -5
Yes, while he is the can, he NOW says, "hey I was lying" and you HOPE and PRAY, THAT IT'S THE "TRUTH" FINALLY??? You all really need to hold on to his dress hem, uh? On the otherside of can lie, is can be telling the truth now. |
|
|
|
Post by CoUrTnEy on Apr 29, 2004 14:32:55 GMT -5
right balkis.. he has now said- "oh wait i was lyin before".. how bout 6 or 7 months later he says- "oh wait again i was lying the last time, and the last last time.. but i am really telling the truth now.. " give us a freakin break.. how many times i gotta say you can't trust an admitted liar.. geez! Yes, while he is the can, he NOW says, "hey I was lying" and you HOPE and PRAY, THAT IT'S THE "TRUTH" FINALLY??? You all really need to hold on to his dress hem, uh? |
|
|
|
Post by ELTRUTH on Apr 29, 2004 14:34:26 GMT -5
Hotep, Instead of making assumptions as to the authenticity of the letter from the international courts, why do not you all call the land and ask? Facts, remember. On the official site it says March, 23, 2004. It is the end of April now. Maku only signed/plead to anything stating he did these alleged crimes because he was told that kathy was experiencing the same things he was experiencing while incarcerated. The world is aware of what is going on. There are foreign news outlets that are doing reports on the Maku. Hotep, thefolks, to say that a man is guilty becuase of confession is to say that man is not guilty because of re-confession. Not only from his own mouth but from "victims" as well. peace fact is if u call the land they will tell u what they are told to tell u, fact is if u call and ask them how many kids he has, if the allegations are true- they will deny it, fact is the same and ONLY vicitm to recant her statment is the same one that did a perternity test PROVING doc was the father of a child she had at a few days BEFORE she turned 17  fact is that she was pregnant at 16 fact is - if they REALLY had something to show from international court they would have. i havent seen it with my own eye - but someone said they saw and heard cathy on tv DESCRIBING her roles. so now she is being forced AND given a story line to say on tv? |
|
