|
|
Post by kAHANyAH on Sept 16, 2004 12:03:00 GMT -5
The very first word in G-d's holy txt. is BERESHITH. The letters that make up this word are Beth,alef, resh, shin, yod, tau. Bereshith literally means "in [the] beginning". It is from the root word Rosh [resh, alef, shin] which is to say 'the head' or chief. Hence G-d begins his works @ the head of all things or within the head ie, the mind. In Xtianity the head of the church is known as Christ.
If we entertain qabala and its approach at word analysis we find in bereshith - BARA [beth, resh, alef] and it means to CREATE. This is why in G-d's beginning we find his work called CREATION. This creation, a beginning of G-d's work is shown in the life and story of Abraham the patriarch. Why is the beginning of G-d's work called creation shown in the life and story of Abraham the patriarch ? because Abraham carries in his bosom [name] the word BARA. The first three letters of Abraham are [Alef, beth and resh] qabalistically spelling out creation.
We can therefor look to Abraham's life journey to gain more insight to the creation tale. Lets observe this...
Gen 15:12 And when the sun was going down, a deep sleep fell upon Abram; and, lo, an horror of great darkness fell upon him.
What is this darkness ? it is the same darkness we find in Gen 1.2. The two are one. The darkness of the great deep. This darkness is called Koshekh. In Gen 1.2, the ruakh_elohim [spirit of G-d] moved upon this darkness to bring about LIGHT. And that light is israeLIGHT [israelite]. G-d's first manifestation or creation came out of BONDAGE, bondage within Koshekh. Abram [abraham] was witnessing the great deep waters of Gen 1.2. where the spirit of G-d moved upon to create his first manifestation - LIGHT. As the psonix reveals, that light is israeLIGHT or israelite.
More analysis to come...
|
|
|
|
Post by 1dell on Sept 17, 2004 7:05:44 GMT -5
I appreciate the attention you have paid to this. I have some information I will run by the hebrews in a bit about the supposedly "Hidden Book" within the Bible. You know anything about that kah?
|
|
|
|
Post by kAHANyAH on Sept 17, 2004 7:10:57 GMT -5
In qabala there is a hidden book called the book of transmigration of souls or the book of gilgal. I am assuming youre referring to this one. Is this the book you are talking about or youre speaking of another one ? I appreciate the attention you have paid to this. I have some information I will run by the hebrews in a bit about the supposedly "Hidden Book" within the Bible. You know anything about that kah? |
|
|
|
Post by 1dell on Sept 17, 2004 7:16:11 GMT -5
Actually bro, when one selects certain correlated verses and chapters from the books of Genesis thru I kings and isolate those verses and combine then we find a hidden book. I should be able to put it together in the next couple of days. In qabala there is a hidden book called the book of transmigration of souls or the book of gilgal. I am assuming youre referring to this one. Is this the book you are talking about or youre speaking of another one ? |
|
|
|
Post by kAHANyAH on Sept 17, 2004 7:22:58 GMT -5
okay this is yetsirah formulaes youre talking about. You do know what youre talking about is a basic formulae that u can use to find *hidden* books and paths on your own that havent been charted out yet by any of the mystiq scholars. okay looking foward to what you've discovered. Actually bro, when one selects certain correlated verses and chapters from the books of Genesis thru I kings and isolate those verses and combine then we find a hidden book. I should be able to put it together in the next couple of days. |
|
|
|
Post by 1dell on Sept 17, 2004 7:34:11 GMT -5
Actually I don't wanna take credit for this discovery. I just purchased a book named"The HIdden Book in the Bible" and I ain't down with his claims but I am approaching it with an open mind maybe it in the process I can uncover something else. Oh about the word B'reshyt. I have seen this word separated thusly Be - Reshyt, then people will Separate Bere - Shyt. They would then focus on Bere or Bara but not Shyt. I prefer the Bere - Shyt separation. Cuz I don't like the corelation to the word Rosh. I don't necessarily subscribe to that school of though. The word Shyt in hebrew means: to place, apply, appoint, array, bring, consider, lay, let alone, look, make, mark, put on, regard, set, shew, be stayed, attire, to put on a dress, wild growth, weeds or briers, thorns. Then bara: to create, to cut down, select, feed, choose, dispatch, do, make and I prefer to put them to gether. Not translating into In the beginning. But moor like the appointed time of the creation process. or the creation being dressed or husbanded or creation putting on her attire. something to that affect okay this is yetsirah formulaes youre talking about. You do know what youre talking about is a basic formulae. You may find *hidden* books and path on your own that havent been charted out yet by any of the mystiq scholars. okay looking foward to what you've discovered. |
|
|
|
Post by kAHANyAH on Sept 17, 2004 7:44:49 GMT -5
If youre breaking it down this way then you'd have to make a dis-claimer. For instance one would say this is a qabalistic approach or another [kAH] would say this is a psonix approach or someone else might say this is a mystiq approach at analyzing the words. The reason why I am saying that is because the word BERESHITH is really two words B' + Reshith = In [the] beginning. Taking the first two letters 'beth' , 'resh', (aleph) would not be accepted in the rules of hebrew syntax and grammar. The Beth, (aleph) denotes the prep. "IN". You know why i am saying this bros. ? cause you use to bust my chops when i would break down words in un-orthodox fashion. What you just did wit 'BARA' is a major hebrew syntax SIN.  Actually I don't wanna take credit for this discovery. I just purchased a book named"The HIdden Book in the Bible" and I ain't down with his claims but I am approaching it with an open mind maybe it in the process I can uncover something else. Oh about the word B'reshyt. I have seen this word separated thusly Be - Reshyt, then people will Separate Bere - Shyt. They would then focus on Bere or Bara but not Shyt. I prefer the Bere - Shyt separation. Cuz I don't like the corelation to the word Rosh. I don't necessarily subscribe to that school of though. The word Shyt in hebrew means: to place, apply, appoint, array, bring, consider, lay, let alone, look, make, mark, put on, regard, set, shew, be stayed, attire, to put on a dress, wild growth, weeds or briers, thorns. Then bara: to create, to cut down, select, feed, choose, dispatch, do, make and I prefer to put them to gether. Not translating into In the beginning. But moor like the appointed time of the creation process. or the creation being dressed or husbanded or creation putting on her attire. something to that affect |
|
|
|
Post by 1dell on Sept 17, 2004 7:51:41 GMT -5
thats because you and derek were going on about that barashyth is bara seth stuff. Talking about adam's 2nd son. I couldn't get down with it because Set means substituted. I sorta forgot the discourse If youre breaking it down this way then you'd have to make a dis-claimer. For instance one would say this is a qabalistic approach or another [kAH] would say this is a psonix approach or someone else might say this is a mystiq approach at analyzing the words. The reason why I am saying that is because the word BERESHITH is really two words B' + Reshith = In [the] beginning. Taking the first two letters 'beth' , 'resh', (aleph) would not be accepted in the rules of hebrew syntax and grammar. The Beth, (aleph) denotes the prep. "IN". You know why i am saying this bros. ? cause you use to bust my chops when i would break down words in un-orthodox fashion. What you just did wit 'BARA' is a major hebrew syntax SIN. |
|
|
|
Post by kAHANyAH on Sept 17, 2004 7:57:39 GMT -5
Well I cant speak for derek but my perspective on word analysis has always been from the mystic point of view. Now back to yo ass!!!! LOL!!! You need to clarify that the "BARA" you are saying is rooted in BERESHITH is not actually etymologically rooted in it. We aint slug fest for a while ya know  thats because you and derek were going on about that barashyth is bara seth stuff. Talking about adam's 2nd son. I couldn't get down with it because Set means substituted. I sorta forgot the discourse |
|
|
|
Post by kAHANyAH on Sept 17, 2004 8:01:37 GMT -5
As I said in the below quoted post, we can look to Abraham's [abram] life story and his relation with G-d to gain insight to the creation tale. So far we've established the darkness [koshekh] that fell upon Abraham is the same darkness where ruakh_ha'Eloahim moved upon to liberate the light from captivity. This light is israeLIGHT/israelite, who were in bondage or captivity in misraim [aegypt]. The time frame for the captivity is 400 yrs. The children of Israel [LIGHT] were trapped in the deep waters [ nile kingdom called aegypt] of Gen 1.1 for a period of 400 yrs. Using number correlation we can equate 400 yrs to the 4th day. How ? because the base in both numbers is 4. We now look to the 4th day to see what came about or what was created in that day. What ever it was, it parallels the children of Israel who came out of bondage after 400 yrs... Gen 1:16 And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: [he made] the stars also. There are three luminaries created in the 4th day - SUN, MOON and STARS. These three represent the seed of Abraham. I will demonstrate this in the next post (from time to time I will jump back and forth in the Abraham's time line). The very first word in G-d's holy txt. is BERESHITH. The letters that make up this word are Beth,alef, resh, shin, yod, tau. Bereshith literally means "in [the] beginning". It is from the root word Rosh [resh, alef, shin] which is to say 'the head' or chief. Hence G-d begins his works @ the head of all things or within the head ie, the mind. In Xtianity the head of the church is known as Christ. If we entertain qabala and its approach at word analysis we find in bereshith - BARA [beth, resh, alef] and it means to CREATE. This is why in G-d's beginning we find his work called CREATION. This creation, a beginning of G-d's work is shown in the life and story of Abraham the patriarch. Why is the beginning of G-d's work called creation shown in the life and story of Abraham the patriarch ? because Abraham carries in his bosom [name] the word BARA. The first three letters of Abraham are [Alef, beth and resh] qabalistically spelling out creation. We can therefor look to Abraham's life journey to gain more insight to the creation tale. Lets observe this... Gen 15:12 And when the sun was going down, a deep sleep fell upon Abram; and, lo, an horror of great darkness fell upon him. What is this darkness ? it is the same darkness we find in Gen 1.2. The two are one. The darkness of the great deep. This darkness is called Koshekh. In Gen 1.2, the ruakh_elohim [spirit of G-d] moved upon this darkness to bring about LIGHT. And that light is israeLIGHT [israelite]. G-d's first manifestation or creation came out of BONDAGE, bondage within Koshekh. Abram [abraham] was witnessing the great deep waters of Gen 1.2. where the spirit of G-d moved upon to create his first manifestation - LIGHT. As the psonix reveals, that light is israeLIGHT or israelite. More analysis to come... |
|
|
|
Post by kAHANyAH on Sept 17, 2004 8:13:30 GMT -5
To show the accuracy in correlation between the days of creation and the descendants of Abraham called the children of israel who escaped from bondage, observe... From the deep waters of gen 1.1 to the luminaries there are 4 DAYS. From abraham to the children of Israel there are 4 SONS - ABRAHAM, ISAAK, JACOB, 12 TRIBES. As I stated the IsraeLIGHTS/Israelites represent the three lights or luminaries of the 4th day creation who escaped from the abyss called the great deep waters [aegypt]. Here is the proof, Gen 37:9 And he dreamed yet another dream, and told it his brethren, and said, Behold, I have dreamed a dream more; and, behold, the sun and the moon and the eleven stars made obeisance to me. The "sun and the moon and the eleven stars" are your luminaries of the 4th day. Hence we see more and more the time line of Abraham is actually the time line of Genesis creation tale. What we will see in the proceeding post is the 12th star - YOSEF [Joseph] is the ADAM of the 6th day. And this Adam is deity archtype BAAL. As I said in the below quoted post, we can look to Abraham's [abram] life story and his relation with G-d to gain insight to the creation tale. So far we've established the darkness [koshekh] that fell upon Abraham is the same darkness where ruakh_ha'Eloahim moved upon to liberate the light from captivity. This light is israeLIGHT/israelite, who were in bondage or captivity in misraim [aegypt]. The time frame for the captivity is 400 yrs. The children of Israel [LIGHT] were trapped in the deep waters [ nile kingdom called aegypt] of Gen 1.1 for a period of 400 yrs. Using number correlation we can equate 400 yrs to the 4th day. How ? because the base in both numbers is 4. We now look to the 4th day to see what came about or what was created in that day. What ever it was, it parallels the children of Israel who came out of bondage after 400 yrs... Gen 1:16 And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: [he made] the stars also. There are three luminaries created in the 4th day - SUN, MOON and STARS. These three represent the seed of Abraham. I will demonstrate this in the next post (from time to time I will jump back and forth in the Abraham's time line). |
|
|
|
Post by 1dell on Sept 17, 2004 8:16:07 GMT -5
DAg bro, I am trying to find common ground even add a little salt and pepper, spice it up a bit and all you wanna do is fight  I am well aware of the article B in hebrew being the article -in- in english. See my problem with that is Bereshiyt separated as B - Reshyt. Well B is a word yes, the word 'in' but reshyt aint a word. I don't believe in Hebrews wasting their words like this. We could say it could be separated like this B - REsh - yt. Now this way yt/ith is a suffix denoting femininity. I guess my problem is I never pronounce Rash as Rosh. That throws me off a bit when I see it. . I am aware of Rashyt and it's meaning but I can't help ignor that yt is a feminine suffix which makes me no like B-reshyt no mo'. So I prefer Bara shyth (seeing as how shyt is actually a word) mystically speaking Well I cant speak for derek but my perspective on word analysis has always been from the mystic point of view. Now back to yo ass!!!! LOL!!! You need to clarify that the "BARA" you are saying is rooted in BERESHITH is not actually etymologically rooted in it. We aint slug fest for a while ya know |
|
|
|
Post by kAHANyAH on Sept 17, 2004 8:23:38 GMT -5
"...mystically speaking" - Thats more like it  . Dude you aint liking the word Bereshith because it has a femi9 suffix ? WTF! type of chauvanistic! you mofo! y u g-d damn! punkified! . Dude the word is a feminin word and it makes sense! cause when you say "IN" Rsht its like INSIDE the womb [beginning] yadayadayadayada... This takes me back to Abraham's time line. Remember the two nations in the womb of RebeKAH ? Whats in a womb ? Aint there Maim ? the same maim we read of in Gen 1.1 or should I say bereshITH 1.1 ? Dont hate on the fem9 my brother  DAg bro, I am trying to find common ground even add a little salt and pepper, spice it up a bit and all you wanna do is fight I am well aware of the article B in hebrew being the article -in- in english. See my problem with that is Bereshiyt separated as B - Reshyt. Well B is a word yes, the word 'in' but reshyt aint a word. I don't believe in Hebrews wasting their words like this. We could say it could be separated like this B - REsh - yt. Now this way yt/ith is a suffix denoting femininity. I guess my problem is I never pronounce Rash as Rosh. That throws me off a bit when I see it. . I am aware of Rashyt and it's meaning but I can't help ignor that yt is a feminine suffix which makes me no like B-reshyt no mo'. So I prefer Bara shyth (seeing as how shyt is actually a word) mystically speaking |
|
|
|
Post by 1dell on Sept 17, 2004 10:23:26 GMT -5
Bro, I didn't say I didn't like the femi9 ending. Goodness, talk about putting words in my mouth. I said I don't prefer that understanding of the word because of it's femi9 ending. I prefer the 2 part division not the 3 part divison of the word. YOu say it's good because of the female aspect of the womb? I prefer B'ra seeing ass how B'rashyt is spelled Bet / resh / ayin / shyn / and tet. The word B'ra (to create) in ibry is spelled Bet / resh / ayin. JUST LIKE B'ra - shyt. And then the word shyt itself. According to your logic B Resh yt would be In the First womb? LOL. nah bru, the suffix is possessive meaning that it belongs to resh making rash femi9. As if to say In her head or "In the First Her" ish don't be making sense. Thats why I put that Yahweh bullshit down! IHaWaH makes much moor sense as does B'ra Shyt as to say Creation's dressing or the dressing or placing of the garment upon creation or the Appointed time of Creation. Hell I have a dozen moor combinations "...mystically speaking" - Thats more like it . Dude you aint liking the word Bereshith because it has a femi9 suffix ? WTF! type of chauvanistic! you mofo! y u g-d damn! punkified! . Dude the word is a feminin word and it makes sense! cause when you say "IN" Rsht its like INSIDE the womb [beginning] yadayadayadayada... This takes me back to Abraham's time line. Remember the two nations in the womb of RebeKAH ? Whats in a womb ? Aint there Maim ? the same maim we read of in Gen 1.1 or should I say bereshITH 1.1 ? Dont hate on the fem9 my brother |
|
|
|
Post by kAHANyAH on Sept 17, 2004 10:38:17 GMT -5
Joseph is the Adam proto-type of gen 1.26. He is BAAL just as Adam was Baal. It was Joseph who sat next to Pharoah on the throne as well as Adam sits by the Elohim. Who is Baal ? He is son of El. Look at this verse... Gen 37:19 And they said one to another, Behold, this dreamer cometh. The hebrew is as follow : B'rshth 37:19 v'ya_armaru aish al-akhiu hana'ah BAAL ha'kalomuth hallazeh bahCorrect translation -
Gen 37:19 and they said man to his brother behold BAAL the dreamer comes.
To show the accuracy in correlation between the days of creation and the descendants of Abraham called the children of israel who escaped from bondage, observe... From the deep waters of gen 1.1 to the luminaries there are 4 DAYS. From abraham to the children of Israel there are 4 SONS - ABRAHAM, ISAAK, JACOB, 12 TRIBES. As I stated the IsraeLIGHTS/Israelites represent the three lights or luminaries of the 4th day creation who escaped from the abyss called the great deep waters [aegypt]. Here is the proof, Gen 37:9 And he dreamed yet another dream, and told it his brethren, and said, Behold, I have dreamed a dream more; and, behold, the sun and the moon and the eleven stars made obeisance to me. The "sun and the moon and the eleven stars" are your luminaries of the 4th day. Hence we see more and more the time line of Abraham is actually the time line of Genesis creation tale. What we will see in the proceeding post is the 12th star - YOSEF [Joseph] is the ADAM of the 6th day. And this Adam is deity archtype BAAL. |
|
