|
|
Post by 1dell on Aug 7, 2004 8:59:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by kAHANyAH on Aug 7, 2004 9:13:11 GMT -5
Why was the light of Jesus of Nazareth having a blinding affect on the apostle Paul ? Many refer to this light as the "blinding light". And why was Paul blind for a period of 3 days , the same amount of days Jesus of Nazareth was to spend in the belly of the beast ? The PEOPLE DEMAND TO KNOW! 1dell  |
|
|
|
Post by 1dell on Aug 7, 2004 9:26:27 GMT -5
Because 3+3=6 and God wanted to give you some moor material for your 666 new testament theories Why was the light of Jesus of Nazareth having a blinding affect on the apostle Paul ? Many refer to this light as the "blinding light". And why was Paul blind for a period of 3 days , the same amount of days Jesus of Nazareth was to spend in the belly of the beast ? The PEOPLE DEMAND TO KNOW! 1dell |
|
|
|
Post by kAHANyAH on Aug 7, 2004 9:35:45 GMT -5
Not quite where I was going wit that. But you didnt answer the first question. How comes the light of Jesus of Nazareth had a blinding affect on Paul ? Also I want to add another question and please 1dell all bulljanks and sly remarks aside for a sec a'ight. I really want to get into this. Is it possible for you to have an open mind and entertain my query ? Here is the question, does the repetitive use of particular numbers in the bible have ANY SIGNIFICANCE WHATSOEVER or its just coincidence in your opinion. Be for real bros. NO JOKES, AIGHT. I promise I wont clown neither. Aight peace. Because 3+3=6 and God wanted to give you some moor material for your 666 new testament theories |
|
|
|
Post by 1dell on Aug 7, 2004 10:00:25 GMT -5
Dude, you know whats funny? Daniel was also affected by a vision that he had of the ancient of days check out danial 10 sometimes. He was weak and fell face first to the ground. There were also some dudes with him they also didn't see the vision but daniel did. Sorta like what paul went thru Why was the light of Jesus of Nazareth having a blinding affect on the apostle Paul ? Many refer to this light as the "blinding light". And why was Paul blind for a period of 3 days , the same amount of days Jesus of Nazareth was to spend in the belly of the beast ? The PEOPLE DEMAND TO KNOW! 1dell |
|
|
|
Post by kAHANyAH on Aug 7, 2004 10:50:55 GMT -5
I really wanted u to respond to my question before we go off on a tangent. But thats kewl. Okay you bring up Daniel. Give me the scripture where Daniel was blinded by the light or vision of the ancient of days. I dont dis-agree the light had an affect on him, but I would like to read where he was blinded. Once we clear that matter we can go back to paul being blinded by the light of Jesus of Nazareth. btw..., is will hung autistic ? peace Dude, you know whats funny? Daniel was also affected by a vision that he had of the ancient of days check out danial 10 sometimes. He was weak and fell face first to the ground. There were also some dudes with him they also didn't see the vision but daniel did. Sorta like what paul went thru |
|
|
|
Post by 1dell on Aug 7, 2004 11:13:37 GMT -5
Actually if you check the time of my post I posted it not long after you posted your 2nd one. So in essence I didn't see your 2nd post by time I hit the submit button. I was just adding extra info I came up with. But to ansaar your questions lets go:
Why was the light of Jesus of Nazareth having a blinding affect on the apostle Paul
Because of the Sudden brightness of his manifestation and probably close proximity to Paul that caused excessive stress on the Retna. But the thing about that is The blindness was temporary which reminds me of the kind of blindness one can experience when a flash bomb goes off near them. I have experienced such blindness myself at night during a night time exercise with cluster bombs going off around us in Kuwait.
And why was Paul blind for a period of 3 days , the same amount of days Jesus of Nazareth was to spend in the belly of the beast ?
Firstly the Messiah didn't spend anytime at all in the belly of the beast, that was an analogy he used to refer to how he would be within the heart of the earth that many days. As for the significance of 3, I am at work and don't have my numerology book on me. So I can't give you the signifance of 3 right now.
Is it possible for you to have an open mind and entertain my query ?
yes
Here is the question, does the repetitive use of particular numbers in the bible have ANY SIGNIFICANCE WHATSOEVER or its just coincidence in your opinion.
oh indeed!!! 40 normally means judgement and 7 completion, etc. But here is the kicker, I don't believe that EVERY SINGLE 6 in the bible has the exact same meaning. Just like tarot cards. the 6 of pentacles don't mean the same as the 6 of Wands. Pentacles deal with money and material aspects while the Wands deal with endeaver, employ and activity. So 3 days in a sea monster and 3 days of blindness don't mean the same thing to me bro.
btw..., is will hung autistic ?
Nah bro Will Hung is asian. But some people think he is retarded. YOu know who he is right? That dude from American Idol.
|
|
|
|
Post by kAHANyAH on Aug 7, 2004 11:23:49 GMT -5
Okay it stands to reason your line of logic says the blinding light had an affect on his retina. SO WHY WEREN'T THE MEN THAT WERE WITH HIM WHO ALSO SAW THE LIGHT NOT BLINDED BY IT or as you put it didnt have their "retinas" affected ? You can read about the men seeing that same "blinding light" in Acts 22.9. Let me cut and paste it for ya... Act 22:9 And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of him that spake to me. Lets stick on the "blinding light" first and once we finish that we can tackle the significance of numbers and their meanings and the period Jesus was in the belly of the beast [earth]. Peace. Actually if you check the time of my post I posted it not long after you posted your 2nd one. So in essence I didn't see your 2nd post by time I hit the submit button. I was just adding extra info I came up with. But to ansaar your questions lets go: Why was the light of Jesus of Nazareth having a blinding affect on the apostle Paul Because of the Sudden brightness of his manifestation and probably close proximity to Paul that caused excessive stress on the Retna. But the thing about that is The blindness was temporary which reminds me of the kind of blindness one can experience when a flash bomb goes off near them. I have experienced such blindness myself at night during a night time exercise with cluster bombs going off around us in Kuwait.And why was Paul blind for a period of 3 days , the same amount of days Jesus of Nazareth was to spend in the belly of the beast ? Firstly the Messiah didn't spend anytime at all in the belly of the beast, that was an analogy he used to refer to how he would be within the heart of the earth that many days. As for the significance of 3, I am at work and don't have my numerology book on me. So I can't give you the signifance of 3 right now. Is it possible for you to have an open mind and entertain my query ? yesHere is the question, does the repetitive use of particular numbers in the bible have ANY SIGNIFICANCE WHATSOEVER or its just coincidence in your opinion. oh indeed!!! 40 normally means judgement and 7 completion, etc. But here is the kicker, I don't believe that EVERY SINGLE 6 in the bible has the exact same meaning. Just like tarot cards. the 6 of pentacles don't mean the same as the 6 of Wands. Pentacles deal with money and material aspects while the Wands deal with endeaver, employ and activity. So 3 days in a sea monster and 3 days of blindness don't mean the same thing to me bro.btw..., is will hung autistic ? Nah bro Will Hung is asian. But some people think he is retarded. YOu know who he is right? That dude from American Idol.
|
|
|
|
Post by 1dell on Aug 7, 2004 12:06:07 GMT -5
Very simple. Lets take into account that details are missing but from the information that we do have lets get some visuals going. Paul is on a road to Damascus, is he walking or riding in something? If he is walking are the men on either side of him or are they behind him? If he is riding is he in the FRONT of the vehicle or the back of the vehicle? Where are teh men in the vehicle? ARe they riding in the front or the back. How many men were there? It seems you already have your mind made up and your line of questioning is just to try to have me following along your path or reasoning in hopes that you will leave me with an ultimatum of accepting your view or things or just be left out there looking wrong. You only want me to be open-minded so my mind can be open to see what YOU have already come to a conclusiong with. the very fact that you are trying to relate this to Ishua spending 3 days and nights in the heart of the earth tells me we aint gonna agree on where you are going with this. So lets continue: Now the vision was for PAUL and the message was for PAUL. Where are the other guys in relation to PauL? The fact that they were not blinded tells me that they were not as close to the light as Paul was or that they may have been looking off to the side or at each other during the time the light shone. It's the difference between Look in the sky when the sun is shining and looking DIRECTLY into the sun. Now the rate of vision loss will be the same. And if the men are talking to each other or looking off to the side or around them, then they will see the light periferially and the lens of the eye is not directly affected. And since they could see a bright light out of corner of their eye they had time to prepare to look directly into the light by covering their eyes with their hands like when you use a sun visor in the car. But the suddan blast of light that appeared DIRECTLY before Paul left PAUL no time to prepare and it blinded him. I mean all the scriptures tell about how the Most High appears as brightness and a bright light. Also too one must innerstand the providence of the Most High, Paul's blindness was healed by a disciple named Ananias. If you look in verse 9 you can see how the Most High sets it all up. Even comes to Ananias personally and tells him about Paul and what he wants him to do to Paul Act 9:8 And Saul arose from the earth; and when his eyes were opened, he saw no man: but they led him by the hand, and brought [him] into Damascus. Act 9:9 And he was three days without sight, and neither did eat nor drink. Act 9:10 And there was a certain disciple at Damascus, named Ananias; and to him said the Lord in a vision, Ananias. And he said, Behold, I [am here], Lord. Act 9:11 And the Lord [said] unto him, Arise, and go into the street which is called Straight, and enquire in the house of Judas for [one] called Saul, of Tarsus: for, behold, he prayeth, Act 9:12 And hath seen in a vision a man named Ananias coming in, and putting [his] hand on him, that he might receive his sight. Act 9:13 Then Ananias answered, Lord, I have heard by many of this man, how much evil he hath done to thy saints at Jerusalem: Act 9:14 And here he hath authority from the chief priests to bind all that call on thy name. Act 9:15 But the Lord said unto him, Go thy way: for he is a chosen vessel unto me, to bear my name before the Gentiles, and kings, and the children of Israel: Act 9:16 For I will shew him how great things he must suffer for my name's sake. See dude, thats how God ALWAYS works. Something here will happen to you ONLY to get to walk down a certain path where you will run into someone or something else that will be of benefit to you. hell I don't feel like explaining that, might be a lil too christiany for your tastes. Okay it stands to reason your line of logic says the blinding light had an affect on his retina. SO WHY WERE THE MEN THAT WERE WITH HIM WHO ALSO SAW THE LIGHT WERE NOT BLINDED BY IT or as you put it didnt have their "retinas" affected ? You can read about the men seeing that same "blinding light" in Acts 22.9. Let me cut and paste it for ya... Act 22:9 And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of him that spake to me. Lets stick on the "blinding light" first and once we finish that we can tackle the significance of numbers and their meanings. Peace. |
|
|
|
Post by kAHANyAH on Aug 7, 2004 12:38:55 GMT -5
*** I try and not write long missives. But when I do you know I gotta get something off my chest! ***1dell bruh. what you just did is to try and find a resoning that conforms to your conviction. Are you telling me every time someone asks you a question pertaining to a tenet in your religion or belief and this question portends to other party readers to put holes in your belief it means they are trying to lead you into a way of thinking ? Dude what youre doing is not dealing with truth. Youre dealing in belief. And thats fine. As long as you declare this and not attempt to pass it off as truth. But it is DISINGENUOUS ON YOUR PART TO CREATE A THREAD ATTEMPTING TO REFUTE what MZYork put out on Paul.Why do I say it is disingenuous on your part ? First off let me make this disclaimer - I am not about defending the personal man MZYork. But I will defend truth, no matter whose mouth it comes out of. I wanted to respond to many of your statements in your thread which have holes (and I can prove it if you want) in them but I gave you that respect and not intrude in the thread. Plus if I recall you didnt want anyone posting in there so I decided to bring it here. I asked you a legitimate question. Why was paul blinded by the light ?. You gave me a response, and i am paraphrasing you - the light was so bright that it affected his retina. I then said well the men who travelled with him also saw the same light but werent affected. The writer obviously put that in there for a reason. But your response is , there are extenuating circumstances and reasons that played into that. Circumstances that "were left out". Left out! come on brother can you give me a better excuse ? However you want us to believe the author didnt put the details and yet he made sure he put in those men saw the same light.  You say they may have been behind, front, etc... of a car and what not. When people read your missive they will say - he's fetching for straws or looking for excuses. Thats what you are doing bros. Youre looking for excuses. Excuses that are OUTSIDE THE REALM OF SCRIPTURE. All that you said dude, those possible scenarios - they are not in the scripture. ITS HYPOTHETICALS or ASSUMPTIONS or GUESSES. And dude you know better then this! I would have accepted you saying you dont know why he was blinded by the light. That to me would be honesty. Instead you are so gung ho in defending your belief, not truth and I emphasize not truth but belief. You will go thru hurdles , leap over walls, do acrobatical feats just so your belief is assured it will not be dis-mantled. Brother I know this sounds as an unwarranted chastisement and if so I do it out of brotherly love. When I read excerpts from the thread you created on Paul I was damn nearly stunned! Why ? because dude did you really think out thorougly many of the things you were saying ? Any of the proficient nuwaubians, if they come across what you wrote can easily contest it. 1dell if they do, and they know their stuff, you gonna come out looking like you dont know what youre talking about. Hey listen man, before you come back and start some ish with me! cause I know i got it coming! LOL!! dude I can show you what I mean. You want me to post up a couple of examples of the things you said in your thread that are incorrect ? I am willing to put aside the blinding light question for now (i still want to build on it though).
|
|
|
|
Post by 1dell on Aug 7, 2004 13:02:09 GMT -5
Tell you what Kah, why don't YOU tell me why they were blinded, unless you have some extra biblical text that gives ALL the details then you are stuck with NOTHING but your prentetious mystical speculations. So why was Paul blinded but the other werent? AS for the Post on Paul the deceiver come withit, you can post to it you are a global moderator. BRING IT!! I get nothing but compliments on that thread. PLEASE bring it!!! I don't have a problem with people sticking to the subject when you guys came over changing the subject and got away from Paul then I had a problem. Show me where I am wrong because you have yet to do it. WHY was Paul blinded? Dude, you trip me out with this crap you always try and act like you are my editor or some shit trying to say every dayum thing I say is wrong (when I have OTHER people saying otherwise) yet you offer no replacement information. Then IF you try to offer something it's so uncheckable and so made-up sounding it's ridiculous? Forensics is PRETTY dayum accurate! Pose that SAME question to a Forensics staff and giving them NOTHING else but the 3 times that Paul describes the occurance and they will come up with nothing short of what I have said! If you USE the information given and not try and make up shit that aint in the book you are forced to come up with the missing pieces. You are saying that Luke included that they saw the light too for a reason? what reason is that kah? huh? You make it sound like Luke what there or some shit! He merely recorded what Paul TOLD him occured. Dayum man you try too dayum hard to make me out to be some incompetent wanna be scholar or some shit. I know what the hell I am talking about Kah. And fo the last 7 years neither you or ANYONE else has come close to proving me otherwise. So until then along this path I tread *** I try and not write long missives. But when I do you know I gotta get something off my chest! ***1dell bruh. what you just did is to try and find a resoning that conforms to your conviction. Are you telling me every time someone asks you a question pertaining to a tenet in your religion or belief and this question portends to other party readers to put holes in your belief it means they are trying to lead you into a way of thinking ? Dude what youre doing is not dealing with truth. Youre dealing in belief. And thats fine. As long as you declare this and not attempt to pass it off as truth. But it is DISINGENUOUS ON YOUR PART TO CREATE A THREAD ATTEMPTING TO REFUTE what MZYork put out on Paul.Why do I say it is disingenuous on your part ? First off let me make this disclaimer - I am not about defending the personal man MZYork. But I will defend truth, no matter whose mouth it comes out of. I wanted to respond to many of your statements in your thread which have holes (and I can prove it if you want) in them but I gave you that respect and not intrude in the thread. Plus if I recall you didnt want anyone posting in there so I decided to bring it here. I asked you a legitimate question. Why was paul blinded by the light ?. You gave me a response, and i am paraphrasing you - the light was so bright that it affected his retina. I then said well the men who travelled with him also saw the same light but werent affected. The writer obviously put that in there for a reason. But your response is , there are extenuating circumstances and reasons that played into that. Circumstances that "were left out". Left out! come on brother can you give me a better excuse ? However you want us to believe the author didnt put the details and yet he made sure he put in those men saw the same light. You say they may have been behind, front, etc... of a car and what not. When people read your missive they will say - he's fetching for straws or looking for excuses. Thats what you are doing bros. Youre looking for excuses. Excuses that are OUTSIDE THE REALM OF SCRIPTURE. All that you said dude, those possible scenarios - they are not in the scripture. ITS HYPOTHETICALS or ASSUMPTIONS or GUESSES. And dude you know better then this! I would have accepted you saying you dont know why he was blinded by the light. That to me would be honesty. Instead you are so gung ho in defending your belief, not truth and I emphasize not truth but belief. You will go thru hurdles , leap over walls, do acrobatical feats just so your belief is assured it will not be dis-mantled. Brother I know this sounds as an unwarranted chastisement and if so I do it out of brotherly love. When I read excerpts from the thread you created on Paul I was damn nearly stunned! Why ? because dude did you really think out thorougly many of the things you were saying ? Any of the proficient nuwaubians, if they come across what you wrote can easily contest it. 1dell if they do, and they know their stuff, you gonna come out looking like you dont know what youre talking about. Hey listen man, before you come back and start some ish with me! cause I know i got it coming! LOL!! dude I can show you what I mean. You want me to post up a couple of examples of the things you said in your thread that are incorrect ? I am willing to put aside the blinding light question for now (i still want to build on it though). |
|
|
|
Post by kAHANyAH on Aug 7, 2004 13:13:14 GMT -5
okay kewl we can debate this. I will post up the errors I find in your paul thread over there. Regarding the blinding of Paul. Why was he blinded by the light ? Lets start with scripture # 1... Jhn 1:5 And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not. Lets tread further. Scripture # 2... Jhn 12:40 He hath blinded their eyes, and hardened their heart; that they should not see with [their] eyes, nor understand with [their] heart, and be converted, and I should heal them. Why did Luke include the fact those men saw the same light, yet they werent blinded ? Because the light of jesus of nazareth is not meant to be interpreted as PHYSICAL LIGHT the way you just did. You should have picked up on that in John the first chp. It explains the light of Logos [word]. This is the problem, too many peeps are not catching unto the instruction on how to read the holy writs. The verses are symbolism meant to convey mysteries. Even yeshua claimed the scripture were symbols of higher mysteries. Anyhow I shall await your response. Peace Tell you what Kah, why don't YOU tell me why they were blinded, unless you have some extra biblical text that gives ALL the details then you are stuck with NOTHING but your prentetious mystical speculations. So why was Paul blinded but the other werent? AS for the Post on Paul the deceiver come withit, you can post to it you are a global moderator. BRING IT!! I get nothing but compliments on that thread. PLEASE bring it!!! I don't have a problem with people sticking to the subject when you guys came over changing the subject and got away from Paul then I had a problem. Show me where I am wrong because you have yet to do it. WHY was Paul blinded? Dude, you trip me out with this crap you always try and act like you are my editor or some shit trying to say every dayum thing I say is wrong (when I have OTHER people saying otherwise) yet you offer no replacement information. Then IF you try to offer something it's so uncheckable and so made-up sounding it's ridiculous? Forensics is PRETTY dayum accurate! Pose that SAME question to a Forensics staff and giving them NOTHING else but the 3 times that Paul describes the occurance and they will come up with nothing short of what I have said! If you USE the information given and not try and make up shit that aint in the book you are forced to come up with the missing pieces. You are saying that Luke included that they saw the light too for a reason? what reason is that kah? huh? You make it sound like Luke what there or some shit! He merely recorded what Paul TOLD him occured. Dayum man you try too dayum hard to make me out to be some incompetent wanna be scholar or some shit. I know what the hell I am talking about Kah. And fo the last 7 years neither you or ANYONE else has come close to proving me otherwise. So until then along this path I tread |
|
|
|
Post by 1dell on Aug 7, 2004 13:20:28 GMT -5
I knew. I FUCKING KNEW IT!!!! DaYUM!! Kah!!! are you serious??? READ chapter 9 of acts man!!!! I can't believe this crap!!!! Ananias prays over Paul to receive his sight BACK, while Ananias is praying for Paul SCALE-LIKE THINGS Fall from his EYES!!! What was so dark about paul that he couldn't comprehend the light yet the men with him could and they were not blinded? They were ALL on their way to persecute christians. Why were they exempt from being blinded? Lord have mercy!!! And you think you can correct me? Act 9:17 And Ananias went his way, and entered into the house; and putting his hands on him said, Brother Saul, the Lord, [even] Jesus, that appeared unto thee in the way as thou camest, hath sent me, that thou mightest receive thy sight, and be filled with the Holy Ghost. Act 9:18 And immediately there fell from his eyes as it had been scales: and he received sight forthwith, and arose, and was baptized. I guess all that happened to his spiritual eyes. okay kewl we can debate this. I will post up the errors I find in your paul thread over there. Regarding the blinding of Paul. Why was he blinded by the light ? Lets start with scripture # 1... Jhn 1:5 And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not[/b]. Lets tread further. Scripture # 2... Jhn 12:40 He hath blinded their eyes, and hardened their heart; that they should not see with [their] eyes, nor understand with [their] heart, and be converted, and I should heal them.Why did Luke include the fact those men saw the same light, yet they werent blinded ? Because the light of jesus of nazareth is not meant to be interpreted as PHYSICAL LIGHT the way you just did. You should have picked up on that in John the first chp. It explains the light of Logos [word]. This is the problem, too many peeps are not catching unto the instruction on how to read the holy writs. The verses are symbolism meant to convey mysteries. Even yeshua claimed the scripture were symbols of higher mysteries. Anyhow I shall await your response. Peace [/quote] |
|
|
|
Post by 1dell on Aug 7, 2004 13:33:09 GMT -5
I can't believe this man. You say that Luke includes that the light shone around the men? No he doesn't! When Luke narrates the event he never says the light shines around the men
Act 9:3 And as he journeyed, he came near Damascus: and suddenly there shined round about him a light from heaven:
Act 9:4 And he fell to the earth, and heard a voice saying unto him, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me?
Act 9:5 And he said, Who art thou, Lord? And the Lord said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest: [it is] hard for thee to kick against the pricks.
Act 9:6 And he trembling and astonished said, Lord, what wilt thou have me to do? And the Lord [said] unto him, Arise, and go into the city, and it shall be told thee what thou must do.
Act 9:7 And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man.
Luke NEVER says the men were exposed to the light, He says that the light shone around Paul from heaven. It's only when Luke QUOTES PAUL elsewhere in the book that we find out about the men seeing the light. But the first time the event it told Luke narrates it, the 2nd and 3rd time he is quoting Paul. So why are you making emphasis on Luke "including" that for a reason.
I swear man, if yall aint gonna be about the book and devote yourselfs to the book and approach it humbly, then yall need to leave the book alone.
Now that only leaves us with trying to figure out how in the world Paul losing his site for 3 days even has a corelations to Ishua being in the heart of the eart for 3 days.
|
|
|
|
Post by kAHANyAH on Aug 7, 2004 13:40:35 GMT -5
1dell Ananias gives Paul his sight or vision , we can agree with this. And this occurs at the end of the three days. Scales fall from his eyes when he recieves sight. Now as I said - holy writs are written to convey mysteries. I am sure you know the bible verse where it speaks of the mystery of Kristos and the mystery of babylon. What I am saying to you is the placing of Ananias hand over Paul's eyes to recieve his vision is "indoctrination" What kind of doctrine ? Lets see what the law says on scales...
Lev 11:9 These shall ye eat of all that [are] in the waters: whatsoever hath fins and scales in the waters, in the seas, and in the rivers, them shall ye eat.
Your eye is your mind. I dont think you need for me to show you the verse where Jesus speaks on the eye and light (just incase the ref., is Matt 6.22). If the eye is the mind, then the substance on the eye [mind] is called KNOWLEGDE [doctrination]. I want to re-direct your attention to the above law scripture and what it says pertaining to "SCALES", the same scales which fell off from Paul's eyes. According to the law , a man of G-d must eat the things from the waters which have scales [and fins]. If they dont have scales then it is unclean unto you. Again, I must re-iterate the verses are conveying mysteries. The scales is clean knowledge of G-d. What Ananias did was to rid and divest Paul's mind [eyes] of all the holy and clean knowledge [scales] he once had. It took a period of three days for this to completely take place. The same period the power of Kristos wanes because of his detaining in the belly of the beast. I knew. I FUCKING KNEW IT!!!! DaYUM!! Kah!!! are you serious??? READ chapter 9 of acts man!!!! I can't believe this crap!!!! Ananias prays over Paul to receive his sight BACK, while Ananias is praying for Paul SCALE-LIKE THINGS Fall from his EYES!!! What was so dark about paul that he couldn't comprehend the light yet the men with him could and they were not blinded? They were ALL on their way to persecute christians. Why were they exempt from being blinded? Lord have mercy!!! And you think you can correct me? Act 9:17 And Ananias went his way, and entered into the house; and putting his hands on him said, Brother Saul, the Lord, [even] Jesus, that appeared unto thee in the way as thou camest, hath sent me, that thou mightest receive thy sight, and be filled with the Holy Ghost. Act 9:18 And immediately there fell from his eyes as it had been scales: and he received sight forthwith, and arose, and was baptized. I guess all that happened to his spiritual eyes. /me |
|
