|
Post by 1dell on Oct 29, 2003 21:06:41 GMT -5
or maybe the Most Hight took a rib out of his Chest and made a woman with it once he reached Nod. I hear that 1 out of 20 people are missing a rib. :nerd:
|
|
|
Post by NAR on Oct 30, 2003 11:00:21 GMT -5
Hotep liyya Antuk (peace to you) I agree but not totally... The woman saw that the tree was good for food and pleasant to the eye according to genesis chapter three verse six. " And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one a sagacious, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat." The woman saw (ra'ah) that the tree was good (tobe) for food before she had eaten the fruit itself. The hebrew word for "evil" is RAH (which is a word symphony for Ra'ah (sight)). The woman had prior knowledge of what was good (tobe) and what was evil (rah) before hand, which is potentially called discernment. NAR, the discernment (partial at that) came after she ate of the fruit. Only after she tasted and consumed the fruit did she feel the after affects. And the first effect she recognized was the "Towb" [good]. But what about the "evil" [ra] ? How comes she could not recognize it ? Unfortunately when she took a bite it was too late . The sting of death [da'ath] took hold of her inner organs.
|
|
|
Post by NAR on Oct 30, 2003 11:28:44 GMT -5
What they did not know or experienced was wisdom (the ability to use the knowledge of good and evil practically and for their benefit). However, that was to change after they both had eaten the fruit from the tree of knowledge of good and evil, which opened their eyes and made them NAKED. The translation NAKED comes from the hebrew word 'eyrom, which comes from the primitive root 'aram (to be wise). And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons. ---Gen 3 v 7 With this verse in mind, the fruit that was eaten by the women and adam was the FIG (and not an apple). I say this because they used fig leaves to make themselves aprons. And hence, the tree in the midst of the garden was more than likely a FIG TREE. Hotep liyya Antuk (peace to you) The woman saw that the tree was good for food and pleasant to the eye according to genesis chapter three verse six. " And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one a sagacious, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat." The woman saw (ra'ah) that the tree was good (tobe) for food before she had eaten the fruit itself. The hebrew word for "evil" is RAH (which is a word symphony for Ra'ah (sight)). The woman had prior knowledge of good (tobe) and revil (rah) before hand, which is called discernment.
|
|
|
Post by NAR on Oct 30, 2003 12:17:01 GMT -5
In ancient times, the tree (ets) was symbolic of the matriarchy (em). One's family tree is usually traced through the woman, the mother of life, the tree of life. Em Khay = Khay Ets is an equality. By dividing both sides by the word KHAY, we are left with the word formula Em = Ets. Peace NAR, 'em chaiy [mother of living] 'ets chaiy [tree of living] are not the same.
|
|
|
Post by kAHANyAH on Oct 30, 2003 13:50:09 GMT -5
I agree "SIGHT" or "VISUAL" is associated with EVIL but still she did not discern "evil" per say. Had she , she would have ref., to it as such. Eve was not acquainted with the NATURE of the EVIL within her eye (pullin the mote out of one's eye). And NAR, think of it like this... If she knew in her heart the VISUAL or the ability to See, which NURTURES evil, she would have RESISTED the temptation which enticed her thru vision (tele- vision or tell lies via vision). Instead she succumb to the "evil eye" [ familiar spirit called Nakash]. Eve was PSYCHIC and it got her in TROUBLE. Psychic people are not psychic in the true sense. What they are are people who get POSSESSED. More to come and more to this then meets the EYE (I). Lets build. Peace Hotep liyya Antuk (peace to you) I agree but not totally... The woman saw that the tree was good for food and pleasant to the eye according to genesis chapter three verse six. " And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one a sagacious, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat." The woman saw (ra'ah) that the tree was good (tobe) for food before she had eaten the fruit itself. The hebrew word for "evil" is RAH (which is a word symphony for Ra'ah (sight)). The woman had prior knowledge of what was good (tobe) and what was evil (rah) before hand, which is potentially called discernment.
|
|
|
Post by kAHANyAH on Oct 30, 2003 13:55:59 GMT -5
I partially agree wit this. The lack of discerment was due to them not having the appropriate wisdom to deal with the situation. Did they eventually KNOW (gnostics) good and evil ? NO, not like the gods. Did they become acquainted (learned) with the affx of good and evil, YES like the demi gods (fallen ones). Remember they NEVER attained the tree of Life. They were prevented by the Gods. What they did not know or experienced was wisdom (the ability to use the knowledge of good and evil practically and for their benefit). However, that was to change after they both had eaten the fruit from the tree of knowledge of good and evil, which opened their eyes and made them NAKED. The translation NAKED comes from the hebrew word 'eyrom, which comes from the primitive root 'aram (to be wise). And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons. ---Gen 3 v 7 With this verse in mind, the fruit that was eaten by the women and adam was the FIG (and not an apple). I say this because they used fig leaves to make themselves aprons. And hence, the tree in the midst of the garden was more than likely a FIG TREE.
|
|
|
Post by NAR on Oct 31, 2003 12:01:51 GMT -5
Good for you Kah, Let's architect... Nakhash was the most subtil BEAST in the field. The word beast used here in the very first verse of genesis chapter three was translated from the hebrew word KHAY (life). The woman (ishshah) had an intimate discussion with the "most subtil beast in the field", namely NAKHASH (keep in mind that Adam and Eve were also beasts (khay) of the Sadeh (field). Nakhash means "wise one" or experienced one. He was the most subtil, which comes from the hebrew word 'arum (aram = naked). Adam and the woman were also NAKED or subtil, wise (gen 2 v 25). But they did not know that they were wise until they met a more experienced principal (called Nakhash, knower of copper, the key element in melano-synthesis). I agree "SIGHT" or "VISUAL" is associated with EVIL but still she did not discern "evil" per say. Had she , she would have ref., to it as such. Eve was not acquainted with the NATURE of the EVIL within her eye (pullin the mote out of one's eye). And NAR, think of it like this... If she knew in her heart the VISUAL or the ability to See, which NURTURES evil, she would have RESISTED the temptation which enticed her thru vision (tele- vision or tell lies via vision). Instead she succumb to the "evil eye" [ familiar spirit called Nakash]. Eve was PSYCHIC and it got her in TROUBLE. Psychic people are not psychic in the true sense. What they are are people who get POSSESSED. More to come and more to this then meets the EYE (I). Lets build. Peace
|
|
|
Post by NAR on Oct 31, 2003 12:30:28 GMT -5
Adam and the woman (later to be called em Khay) already had LIFE (Khay). Remember, Adam, the man, was driven out of the Garden (Eve, the mother of all life remained). "So he drove out the man (adam); and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life." Comment: "Remember they NEVER attained the tree of Life. They were prevented by the Gods." My comment:
I totally disagree with your comment. Because genesis chapter two verse sixteen states otherwise:
"And the LORD God commanded the man (adam), saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat (this includes the tree of life (Etz Khay))" I partially agree wit this. The lack of discerment was due to them not having the appropriate wisdom to deal with the situation. Did they eventually KNOW (gnostics) good and evil ? NO, not like the gods. Did they become acquainted (learned) with the affx of good and evil, YES like the demi gods (fallen ones). Remember they NEVER attained the tree of Life. They were prevented by the Gods.
|
|
|
Post by kAHANyAH on Oct 31, 2003 13:20:34 GMT -5
It is true, Adam and Eve were "arum" [subtil] just as the serpent. However, the script is clear on this... they did not KNOW (to be conscious and aware of one's state) they were "arum" until after they were exposed to the affx of the fruits when they were enticed by the Nakash. Here is the verse that illustrates lack of consciousness on the part of Adam and Eve in their nakedness -> Gen 2:25, And they were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed. Now here is the vrs., which shows Adam and Eve becoming aware and conscious of their "arum" [naked] after eating the forbidden fruit -> Gen 3:7 And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they [were] naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons.. . This is the same process one undergoes when they dream. Most people that dream aren't "aware" they are dreaming in the dream until after the dream is over when they are in the wake state. One who gains consciousness in the dream and knows he is dreaming during the course of the dream is "aware". Nakash exposed them to the reality of being sentient. As I stated before, they were without WISDOM of the gods prior to and after eating the fruits of Da'ath [knowledge] . The word "wise" that she says she witnessed after eating the fruit is Sakal. The wisdom of the gods is Chok'mah. The two aren't the same. The wisdom of Eve and Adam was that of acquaintance with the inferior knowledge of the nefiliym. Good for you Kah, Let's architect... Nakhash was the most subtil BEAST in the field. The word beast used here in the very first verse of genesis chapter three was translated from the hebrew word KHAY (life). The woman (ishshah) had an intimate discussion with the "most subtil beast in the field", namely NAKHASH (keep in mind that Adam and Eve were also beasts (khay) of the Sadeh (field). Nakhash means "wise one" or experienced one. He was the most subtil, which comes from the hebrew word 'arum (aram = naked). Adam and the woman were also NAKED or subtil, wise (gen 2 v 25). But they did not know that they were wise until they met a more experienced principal (called Nakhash, knower of copper, the key element in melano-synthesis).
|
|
|
Post by kAHANyAH on Oct 31, 2003 13:34:31 GMT -5
NAR, the command was given to them to EAT OF EVERY TREE. However they were told not to eat the tree in the midst of the garden. As I proved earlier, there were two trees in the midst of the garden of Eden. And it is obvious on the onset they did not know which of the two was the right one so they opted not to touch neither. That is until the Nakash came along. And we know the outcome of what tree they touched after he intervened. Did Adam and Eve have CHAIY ? Of course!! But there is a difference between Chaiy and the Chaiy emiting from the ets [tree]. Let me show you what I mean... Gen 3:22, And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:. Do you see what the Tree of Life [ets chaiy] produces ? It produces "ever" or in the hebraic form olam. Thats eternity stamped unto LIFE. Eve [mother of all chaiy] did not have that in her ability. Though she could produce chaiy, she could not temper chaiy with Olam. Only the tree of life could do this. In other words, Eve was only able to give humanity TEMPORAL LIFE. And this is why I said 'em chaiy' [mother of life] and 'etz chaiy' [tree of life] aren't the same grades. Lets cont. to build. Peace Adam and the woman (later to be called em Khay) already had LIFE (Khay). Remember, Adam, the man, was driven out of the Garden (Eve, the mother of all life remained). "So he drove out the man (adam); and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life." Comment: "Remember they NEVER attained the tree of Life. They were prevented by the Gods." My comment:
I totally disagree with your comment. Because genesis chapter two verse sixteen states otherwise:
"And the LORD God commanded the man (adam), saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat (this includes the tree of life (Etz Khay))"
|
|
|
Post by NAR on Oct 31, 2003 15:01:15 GMT -5
Nakhash taught them of not being "sentient (deaf,dumb and blind)" beings, but of being GODS (Elohim), teachers of good and evil. After all man was created in the image and likeness of the Elohim. It is true, Adam and Eve were "arum" [subtil] just as the serpent. However, the script is clear on this... they did not KNOW (to be conscious and aware of one's state) they were "arum" until after they were exposed to the affx of the fruits when they were enticed by the Nakash. Here is the verse that illustrates lack of consciousness on the part of Adam and Eve in their nakedness -> Gen 2:25, And they were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed. Now here is the vrs., which shows Adam and Eve becoming aware and conscious of their "arum" [naked] after eating the forbidden fruit -> Gen 3:7 And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they [were] naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons.. . This is the same process one undergoes when they dream. Most people that dream aren't "aware" they are dreaming in the dream until after the dream is over when they are in the wake state. One who gains consciousness in the dream and knows he is dreaming during the course of the dream is "aware". Nakash exposed them to the reality of being sentient. As I stated before, they were without WISDOM of the gods prior to and after eating the fruits of Da'ath [knowledge] . The word "wise" that she says she witnessed after eating the fruit is Sakal. The wisdom of the gods is Chok'mah. The two aren't the same. The wisdom of Eve and Adam was that of acquaintance with the inferior knowledge of the nefiliym.
|
|
|
Post by NAR on Oct 31, 2003 15:32:26 GMT -5
Adam was commanded to eat freely of the TREE, except the tree of knowledge. With that said they had eaten of the Etz Khay (tree of life). The only tree that was not touched in the mean time was Etz Da'ath because the Lord God commanded them not to (although he lied to them about death (truth)). The hebrew word for "death" is Mooth, which is an egiptian word for TRUTH (Ma'aT). The apparent reason they were commanded not to eat of the Etz khay was that they would have found out the TRUTH (mooth) about their nakedness (arum). Nakhash helped in uncovering that truth, and hence breaking the spell of ignorance and lies. The Hebrew Olam is cognate of the Arabic ALIM, which means ALL KNOWING. The Tree of Life would have not only allowed them to LIVE eternally but also given them the ability to never forget (remembrance). Recall that later in the book of Genesis (fourth chapter) the Mortal ENOSH (the forgetfull one) was born by Seth, the replacement for ABEL. In addition, the first man was called ZAKAR (to Remember). This hebrew word Zakar is a word symphony for Sakal (for the L/R are interchangeable)---to be wise, prudent. This is an attribute that the LORD GOD (one of the elohim) obviously Lacked. For he had to ask where adam and the woman were hiding. This is not a god who is ALIM or All Knowing. And the LORD God called unto Adam, and said unto him, Where art thou? And he said, I heard (shama) thy voice in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was naked (subtil); and I hid myself. And he said, Who told thee that thou wast naked (subtil)? Hast thou eaten of the tree, whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldest not eat?NAR, the command was given to them to EAT OF EVERY TREE. However they were told not to eat the tree in the midst of the garden. As I proved earlier, there were two trees in the midst of the garden of Eden. And it is obvious on the onset they did not know which of the two was the right one so they opted not to touch neither. That is until the Nakash came along. And we know the outcome of what tree they touched after he intervened. Did Adam and Eve have CHAIY ? Of course!! But there is a difference between Chaiy and the Chaiy emiting from the ets [tree]. Let me show you what I mean... Gen 3:22, And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:. Do you see what the Tree of Life [ets chaiy] produces ? It produces "ever" or in the hebraic form olam. Thats eternity stamped unto LIFE. Eve [mother of all chaiy] did not have that in her ability. Though she could produce chaiy, she could not temper chaiy with Olam. Only the tree of life could do this. In other words, Eve was only able to give humanity TEMPORAL LIFE. And this is why I said 'em chaiy' [mother of life] and 'etz chaiy' [tree of life] aren't the same grades. Lets cont. to build. Peace
|
|
|
Post by NAR on Oct 31, 2003 15:52:20 GMT -5
Out of Jealousy and an inferiority complex, one of the Elohim (who ever that may be) decided to kick adam out of the garden; while allowing the woman to remain. Who is a Manito? asks a mystic Meda Chant of the Algonkians.'He, is the reply, 'he who walketh with a serpent, walking the ground; he is a manito (spirit).'And the LORD God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou [art] cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life:Pa Naba Ra (True Man) Adam was commanded to eat freely of the TREE, except the tree of knowledge. With that said they had eaten of the Etz Khay (tree of life). The only tree that was not touched in the mean time was Etz Da'ath because the Lord God commanded them not to (although he lied to them about death (truth)). The hebrew word for "death" is Mooth, which is an egiptian word for TRUTH (Ma'aT). The apparent reason they were commanded not to eat of the Etz khay was that they would have found out the TRUTH (mooth) about their nakedness (arum). Nakhash helped in uncovering that truth, and hence breaking the spell of ignorance and lies. The Hebrew Olam is cognate of the Arabic ALIM, which means ALL KNOWING. The Tree of Life would have not only allowed them to LIVE eternally but also given them the ability to never forget (remembrance). Recall that later in the book of Genesis (fourth chapter) the Mortal ENOSH (the forgetfull one) was born by Seth, the replacement for ABEL. In addition, the first man was called ZAKAR (to Remember). This hebrew word Zakar is a word symphony for Sakal (for the L/R are interchangeable)---to be wise, prudent. This is an attribute that the LORD GOD (one of the elohim) obviously Lacked. For he had to ask where adam and the woman were hiding. This is not a god who is ALIM or All Knowing. And the LORD God called unto Adam, and said unto him, Where art thou? And he said, I heard (shama) thy voice in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was naked (subtil); and I hid myself. And he said, Who told thee that thou wast naked (subtil)? Hast thou eaten of the tree, whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldest not eat?
|
|
|
Post by kAHANyAH on Oct 31, 2003 19:01:15 GMT -5
It is impossible for them to have eaten from the tree of life because they would have lived for ever even with the knowledge of Good/Evil. Look what the vrs. says, Genesis 3.22, " And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:". See NAR, the script. is plain. It states that had Adam and Eve ate from both trees, they would have lived for ever while knowing good/evil. But in your argument, youre claiming that they were already eating from the tree of life. If this were the case then they would have beat the elohim to the punch and avoided the above vrs. I quoted. Peace Adam was commanded to eat freely of the TREE, except the tree of knowledge. With that said they had eaten of the Etz Khay (tree of life). The only tree that was not touched in the mean time was Etz Da'ath because the Lord God commanded them not to (although he lied to them about death (truth)). The hebrew word for "death" is Mooth, which is an egiptian word for TRUTH (Ma'aT). The apparent reason they were commanded not to eat of the Etz khay was that they would have found out the TRUTH (mooth) about their nakedness (arum). Nakhash helped in uncovering that truth, and hence breaking the spell of ignorance and lies. The Hebrew Olam is cognate of the Arabic ALIM, which means ALL KNOWING. The Tree of Life would have not only allowed them to LIVE eternally but also given them the ability to never forget (remembrance). Recall that later in the book of Genesis (fourth chapter) the Mortal ENOSH (the forgetfull one) was born by Seth, the replacement for ABEL. In addition, the first man was called ZAKAR (to Remember). This hebrew word Zakar is a word symphony for Sakal (for the L/R are interchangeable)---to be wise, prudent. This is an attribute that the LORD GOD (one of the elohim) obviously Lacked. For he had to ask where adam and the woman were hiding. This is not a god who is ALIM or All Knowing. And the LORD God called unto Adam, and said unto him, Where art thou? And he said, I heard (shama) thy voice in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was naked (subtil); and I hid myself. And he said, Who told thee that thou wast naked (subtil)? Hast thou eaten of the tree, whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldest not eat?
|
|
|
Post by kAHANyAH on Oct 31, 2003 19:05:02 GMT -5
The god that expelled the couple from gan [eden] was jealous ? That is possible and an high probability. Exodus 34.14 For thou shalt worship no other god: for the LORD, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God:Out of Jealousy and an inferiority complex, one of the Elohim (who ever that may be) decided to kick adam out of the garden; while allowing the woman to remain. Who is a Manito? asks a mystic Meda Chant of the Algonkians.'He, is the reply, 'he who walketh with a serpent, walking the ground; he is a manito (spirit).'And the LORD God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou [art] cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life:Pa Naba Ra (True Man)
|
|